SPIE Membership Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
SPIE Photonics West 2018 | Call for Papers

OPIE 2017

OPIC 2017




Print PageEmail PageView PDF


Improved power conversion efficiency of solar cells

Inorganic nanostructures are used in hybrid solar cells to improve light absorption and carrier transportation.

21 November 2014, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201411.005663

Optical absorption and anti-reflection are important factors in achieving high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of solar cells. This is because photon absorption relates positively to photocurrent generation. The main conventional strategy for reducing reflection is to implement both pyramid textures and anti-reflection coatings (e.g., silicon nitride or magnesium fluoride). Pyramid textures can be produced by low-cost and low-power consumptive potassium hydroxide wet etching at normal temperature and pressure. Anti-reflection coatings, however, require high-vacuum facilities, such as chemical vapor deposition. This leads to high energy consumption and increases the cost of the manufacturing process. Moreover, it is difficult to form a combination of pyramid textures and anti-reflection coatings on devices that are not silicon-based (e.g., organic/inorganic hybrid solar cells or organic-based solar cells).

In recent years, subwavelength-scale inorganic nanostructures (such as nanowires and nanoholes) have attracted significant attention because of the nanostructure-induced light-trapping effect.1, 2 When light is incident on these nanostructures, photons bounce back and forth between nanoscale gaps, which causes an increase in light absorption (see Figure 1). Inorganic materials, such as silicon (Si) and zinc oxide (ZnO), are generally more robust than organic ones. Therefore, inorganic nanostructures can be preserved for longer periods and the manufacturing of these devices is easier than for organic equivalents.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram illustrating the light-trapping effect that occurs in nanostructures.

In addition to the optical and mechanical benefits of our inorganic nanostructures, we have also improved their electrical properties by synthesizing a device junction along the nanostructure surface. This rough junction substantially increases the junction area, compared with the area of a planar junction (see Figure 2). This enlarged junction area can enhance the short-circuit current density (Jsc) and suppress the series resistance (Rs) because of the proportionality of junction area to Jsc and the inverse proportionality of junction area to Rs. We use solution processes to form both our Si and ZnO nanostructures. We use metal-assisted chemical etching for the Si3 and a hydrothermal process for the ZnO devices, respectively.4

Figure 2. Schematic diagrams of (top) a planar electron junction and (bottom) an electron junction that has been enlarged with a nanostructure (shown in blue). HTL: Hole transporting layer. ETL: Electron transporting layer.

Our Si and ZnO inorganic nanostructures (i.e., nanowires, nanorods, or nanoholes) can be used in Si/organic and ZnO/organic hybrid solar cells. The photoactive region of the Si/organic cells consists of both Si and the Si nanostructure, and for the ZnO/organic cells it is an organic blend. The organic material in our Si hybrid cells functions as a hole transporter, but it acts as a photoactive layer in the ZnO hybrid solar cells.

We use a solution process to form our Si/organic hybrid solar cells, in which we combine Si nanowires (SiNWs) and Si nanoholes (SiNHs) with a conducting polymer, i.e., poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). Our recent results show that both SiNW and SiNH arrays can suppress total reflectance to about 1% in the Si absorption region. We are also able to maintain specific reflectance to less than 10% even if the angle of incidence is increased to 80°.5 Our SiNH/PEDOT:PSS solar cells have high Jsc, open-circuit voltage (Voc), and fill factor (FF) of 36.80mA/cm2, 0.520V, and 66.50%, respectively. We are therefore able to achieve PCE of 12.72% with these devices. For our SiNW device, we obtain a Jsc of 28.86mA/cm2, Voc of 0.525V, FF of 71.75%, and PCE of 10.87%. For comparison, Jsc, Voc, FF, and PCE for a planar device are only 11.14mA/cm2, 0.511V, 37.24%, and 2.12%, respectively. The PCE enhancement of our inorganic nanostructures is therefore significant.3, 5

Our ZnO/organic hybrid solar cells are constructed from ZnO nanorods and poly{ [4,8-bis-(2-ethyl-hexyl-thiophene-5-yl)-benzol [1,2-b:4,5-b] dithiophene-2,6-diyl]-alt-[2-(2′-ethyl-hexanoyl)-thieno[3,4-b]thiophen-4,6-diyl]}:[6,6]-phenyl C71 butyric acid methyl ester. With these devices we achieve high PCE (7.26%), through Jsc, Voc, and FF values of 16.8mA/cm2, 0.734V, and 59.0%, respectively,4 whereas for planar ZnO layers, PCE, Jsc, Voc, and FF are only 5.22%, 11.4mA/cm2, 0.780V, and 58.7%, respectively.4 The difference in Jsc is caused by our use of ZnO nanorods. We have optimized the effectiveness of our ZnO nanorods by using a two-step growth technique. We developed this process to lengthen the nanorods without obviously expanding their thickness. Our results show that—with a rod length of 230nm±10nm—Jsc increases from 16.8mA/cm2 to 18.4mA/cm2, and PCE, Voc, and FF become 7.80%, 0.733V, and 58.0%, respectively.

We have designed and built novel Si and ZnO nanostructures. We have conducted tests on these devices, showing they can be successfully used to improve solar cell performance, especially in terms of short-circuit current density and power conversion efficiency. Our future research will have two main foci. First, we will develop new coating techniques and materials to passivate the surfaces of our nanostructures (to suppress the degradation of cell performance caused by increased junction areas). We will also use our ZnO nanorod arrays to improve the performance of perovskite solar cells.

Ching-Fuh Lin, Hong-Jhang Syu, Thiyagu Subramani, Hsin-Che Lee
Graduate Institute of Photonics and Optoelectronics
National Taiwan University
Taipei, Taiwan

Ching-Fuh Lin is an SPIE Fellow, IEEE Fellow, and a distinguished professor. His major areas of research are photonics (including hybrid solar cells), light-emission technologies, silicon-based photonics, and physics in broadband semiconductor lasers and optical amplifiers.

1. S.-C. Shiu, J.-J. Chao, S.-C. Hung, C.-L. Yeh, C.-F. Lin, Morphology dependence of silicon nanowire/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) heterojunction solar cells, Chem. Mater. 22, p. 3108-3133, 2010.
2. H.-J. Syu, S.-C. Shiu, C.-F. Lin, Silicon nanowire/organic hybrid solar cell with efficiency of 8.40%, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 98, p. 267-272, 2012.
3. H.-J. Syu, S.-C. Shiu, Y.-J. Hung, C.-C. Hsueh, T.-C. Lin, T. Subramani, S.-L. Lee, C.-F. Lin, Influences of silicon nanowire morphology on its electro-optical properties and applications for hybrid solar cells, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 21, p. 1400-1410, 2013. doi:10.1002/pip.2375
4. S.-H. Kao, Z.-L. Tseng, P.-Y. Ho, C.-Y. Kao, S. Thiyagu, C.-F. Lin, Significance of the ZnO nanorod array morphology for low-bandgap polymer solar cells in inverted structures, J. Mater. Chem. A 1, p. 14641-14648, 2013.
5. S. Thiyagu, C.-C. Hsueh, C.-T. Liu, H.-J. Syu, T.-C. Lin, C.-F. Lin, Hybrid organic-inorganic heterojunction solar cells with 12% efficiency by utilizing flexible film-silicon with hierarchical surface, Nanoscale 6, p. 3361-3366, 2014.