Optimax Systems, Inc. Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
    Advertisers
SPIE Photonics West 2018 | Call for Papers

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2018 | Call for Papers

SPIE Photonics Europe 2018 | Call for Papers

SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS

SPIE PRESS

SPIE PRESS

Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging

Piezotronics for sensors and energy technology

Strain-induced polarization charges in piezoelectric semiconductors modulate the electronic and optoelectronic processes of charge carriers at the interface, opening up novel applications.

17 March 2014, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201403.005374

New technologies for developing electronics/optoelectronics with tunable functionalities and performance are critical to emerging applications in wearable electronics, communications, robotics, prosthetics, and biomedical treatments. For these applications, the active and adaptive interactions between devices and stimuli (e.g., from the human body) are essential. Although mechanical stimuli are ubiquitous and abundant in the environment for potential interactions with these electronics/optoelectronics,1–3 they are difficult to implement with conventional silicon devices.

Purchase SPIE Field Guide to MicroscopyThe piezoelectric effect has been widely used for electromechanical sensing, actuating, and energy harvesting. Charge polarization occurs in response to mechanical deformation in materials lacking inversion symmetry. Conventional piezoelectric materials such as Pb(ZrxTi1−x)O3 (PZT) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) are insulating and hence not suitable for constructing functional electronics or optoelectronics. Because of this, the effect of mechanically induced polarization on charge carriers in piezoelectric materials has long been overlooked. Semiconductor materials such as zinc oxide (ZnO), gallium nitride, and cadmium sulfide with wurtzite or zinc blende structure also possess piezoelectric properties. However, they have relatively small piezoelectric coefficients and so have not been used as extensively in piezoelectric sensors and actuators.4

Despite this, their combination of piezoelectric polarization with semiconductor properties gives rise to novel fundamental phenomena and has novel device applications, leading to increasing interest in the emerging field of ‘piezotronics’ since it was first identified in 2006.5 The piezotronic effect modulates charge carrier transport across a metal-semiconductor (M-S) barrier or p-n junction by mechanical deformation. Strain-induced charge polarization results from redistributed free carriers and band structure changes near the interface (see Figure 1).1,2,4 Generally, the negative piezoelectric polarization charges induced near the barrier/junction interface repel electrons, further depleting the interface. Positive piezoelectric polarization charges attract electrons toward the interface, reducing depletion. Strain-induced polarization charges hence effectively modulate the local interfacial band structure and charge carrier transport. ‘Piezotronics’ describes electronic devices using these interfacial piezoelectric polarization charges as gate-controlling signals. Such devices are fundamentally different in operation from, for example, the electrically gated field effect transistor.


Figure 1. Schematic energy diagram showing how piezopotential modulates the metal-semiconductor (M-S) contact and p-n junctions. (a) With compressive strain applied, the negative piezoelectric polarization ionic charges induced near the M-S interface increase the local Schottky barrier height (SBH). (b) With tensile strain applied, the positive piezoelectric polarization ionic charges induced near the M-S interface decrease the local SBH. (c) and (d) With strain applied, the piezoelectric polarization ionic charges are induced near the p-n junction interface. Ef, m, Ef, s: Fermi level of the metal and semiconductor, respectively. n-type, p-type: Semiconductor with negatively charged electrons or positively charged ‘holes’ as carriers, respectively.

By replacing the external gating voltage with strain-induced polarization charges for controlling charge transport, we have developed two-terminal strain-gated piezotronic transistors.6, 7 More complex functionalities have also been developed following these preliminary demonstrations, such as strain-gated piezotronic logic nanodevices for performing mechanically modulated electronic logic operation. Another example is a piezotronic strain memory device with write/read access of the memory cell programmed via electromechanical modulation for electrically recording and reading out the logical levels of applied strain.6, 8

Eliminating the gate electrode in a piezotronic transistor enables novel 3D structuring. Using the piezoelectric polarization charges created at the M-S interface to modulate transport process of local charge carriers, we could apply the piezotronic effect to design independently addressable two-terminal transistor arrays. In this way, we converted mechanical stimuli applied to the devices into local electronic controlling signals. Based on this concept, we designed and developed a way to integrate circuitry of vertical ZnO nanowire (NW) transistors in 3D on a large scale (92×92 tactile pixels in 1cm2) as a flexible force/pressure-sensor matrix for artificial skin (see Figure 2).5,7


Figure 2. (a) Comparison of (left) a three-terminal voltage-gated nanowire (NW) field effect transistor (FET) and (right) a two-terminal strain-gated vertical piezotronic transistor. Zinc oxide (ZnO) NWs in the strain-gated vertical piezotronic transistor (SGVPT) grow along the c-axis, as indicated by the red arrow. (b) Schematic illustration of a 3D SGVPT array with tactile pixel density of 92×92 and scheme for spatial profile imaging of local stress (indicated by the downward blue arrowhead) by the array (zoom-in schematic). (c) Equivalent circuit diagram of the 3D SGVPT array. The region highlighted by black dashed lines is the unit SGVPT device, in which εg represents the mechanical strain gate signal and the vertical dotted line between the two terminals of SGVPT presents the modulation effect of εg on the conducting characteristics of the device. (d) Top view of topological profile image of the SGVPT array and, inset, 3D perspective view of the topological profile image revealing the vertical hierarchy of the SGVPT assembly in which the color gradient represents different heights. (e) Photographs showing the transparency and flexibility of the SGVPT array device.

Our artificial skin exhibits performance comparable to human skins. Its integration complexity, spatial resolution, and response are superior to any previous tactile sensing nanodevices. Remarkably, the strain-gated vertical piezotronic transistors have several unique capabilities not available in existing technologies. First, they can detect changes to the device shape in situ in real time and feed back the sensed changes to calibrate other system functions, for instance, for an artificial tissue or prosthetic device. Second, self-powered active tactile sensing emulates the physiological operations of biological mechanoreceptors, such as human hair follicles in the skin and hair cells in the cochlea and can stimulate neurons, for instance, for regenerative therapy in prosthetic skins. The mechanism is completely different from the piezoresistive effect (see Table 1). The change from a three-terminal configuration to a two-terminal configuration significantly simplifies layout design and circuitry fabrication while maintaining effective control over individual devices.

Table 1. Comparison of the piezoresistive and piezotronic effects.
Piezoresistive effect Piezotronic effect
Linear current-voltage curve Non-linear ‘rectifying’ current-voltage curve
Symmetric effect on end-contacts Asymmetric effect on end-contacts
No polarity Strong polarity
‘Volume’ effect ‘Interface’ effect
No switch function Switch function

The piezoelectric polarization charges can also control the charge separation, transport, and recombination in optoelectronic processes,2, 9,10 which is the piezo-phototronic effect. This effect enhances the performance of photocells,11–13 the sensitivity of photodetectors, and the external efficiency of an LED.14, 15 Furthermore, strain-controlled LED emission can be used to directly ‘image’ the force/pressure distribution on a device with micrometer resolution,16 by using strain-induced polarization charges to tune local light-emitting intensity from individual NW-LEDs. The 2D distribution of light-emission intensity then becomes a map of the pressure distribution on the surface (see Figure 3).5 This approach is novel in relying on the piezoelectric polarization charges for a stable, fast response and parallel-detection strain-sensor arrays. The output signal is electroluminescence, which is easy to integrate with photonic technologies for fast data transmission, processing, and recording, and may enable the development of highly intelligent human-machine interfaces. This may represent a major step toward on-chip recording of mechanical signals by optical means.


Figure 3. (a) Illustration showing the working process of pressure distribution imaging. (b) Optical image of the device with a convex mold on top. (c--e) Electroluminescence images of the device at strains of 0, −0.06, and −0.15%, respectively. The images clearly show a change occurred in LED intensity only at the compressed pixels. (f) 2D contour map of the E(x,y) factor derived from the LED intensity images shown in (c) and (e). It directly presents the word ‘PIEZO,’ as given on the mold. (g) Line profile data showing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the enhancement (E) factor for the vertical pink line on the molded pattern shown in (e). (h) Line profile data showing the SNR of the enhancement (E) factor for the horizontal red line away from the pattern shown in (e). For LEDs on the vertical pink line, their illumination is enhanced due to the piezotronic effect, as shown in (g). For LEDs on the horizontal red line, there is no enhancement in their illumination, as shown in (h).

In summary, the essence of the emerging research and applications in piezotronics and piezo-phototronics relies on the coupling between strain-induced polarization and semiconductor properties in piezoelectric semiconductor materials. Piezotronics provides a novel approach for modulating device characteristics by tuning the junction/contact properties. Until now, it was not possible to do this without modifying the interface structure or chemistry. We expect piezotronics and piezo-phototronics to enable technological advances in sensing, human-electronics interfacing, robotics, biomedical therapy, prosthetics, bioimaging, and optical microelectromechanical systems. Future work will include producing the tactile pixel arrays from single NWs instead of bundles to improve the sensitivity of the arrays by at least three orders of magnitude and integrating the arrays onto CMOS silicon devices.


Zhong Lin Wang, Wenzhuo Wu
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA

References:
1. Z. L. Wang, Progress in piezotronics and piezo-phototronics, Adv. Mater. 24, p. 4632-4646, 2012.
2. Z. L. Wang, Piezotronics and Piezo-Phototronics, Springer, 2013.
3. Z. L. Wang, W. Z. Wu, Nanotechnology-enabled energy harvesting for self-powered micro-/nanosystems, Angew. Chem. Int'l Ed. 51, p. 11700-11721, 2012.
4. Z. L. Wang, Piezopotential gated nanowire devices: piezotronics and piezo-phototronics, Nano Today 5, p. 540-552, 2010.
5. W. Z. Wu, C. F. Pan, Y. Zhang, X. N. Wen, Z. L. Wang, Piezotronics and piezo-phototronics—from single nanodevices to array of devices and then to integrated functional system, Nano Today 8, p. 619-642, 2013.
6. W. Z. Wu, Y. G. Wei, Z. L. Wang, Strain-gated piezotronic logic nanodevices, Adv. Mater. 22, p. 4711-4715, 2010.
7. W. Z. Wu, X. N. Wen, Z. L. Wang, Taxel-addressable matrix of vertical-nanowire piezotronic transistors for active and adaptive tactile imaging, Science 340, p. 952-957, 2013.
8. W. Z. Wu, Z. L. Wang, Piezotronic nanowire-based resistive switches as programmable electromechanical memories, Nano Lett. 11, p. 2779-2785, 2011.
9. Z. L. Wang, From nanogenerators to piezotronics—a decade-long study of ZnO nanostructures, MRS Bull. 37, p. 814-827, 2012.
10. Z. L. Wang, Progress in piezotronics and piezo-phototronics, Adv. Mater. 24, p. 4632-4646, 2012.
11. Y. Yang, W. Guo, Y. Zhang, Y. Ding, X. Wang, Z. L. Wang, Piezotronic effect on the output voltage of P3HT/ZnO micro/nanowire heterojunction solar cells, Nano Lett. 11, p. 4812-4817, 2011.
12. C. F. Pan, S. Niu, Y. Ding, L. Dong, R. Yu, Y. Liu, G. Zhu, Z. L. Wang, Enhanced Cu2S/CdS coaxial nanowire solar cells by piezo-phototronic effect, Nano Lett. 12, p. 3302-3307, 2012.
13. Y. F. Hu, Y. Zhang, Y. L. Chang, R. L. Snyder, Z. L. Wang, Optimizing the power output of a ZnO photocell by piezopotential, ACS Nano 4, p. 4220-4224, 2010.
14. Q. Yang, W. H. Wang, S. Xu, Z. L. Wang, Enhancing light emission of ZnO microwire-based diodes by piezo-phototronic effect, Nano Lett. 11, p. 4012-4017, 2011.
15. Q. Yang, et al., Largely enhanced efficiency in ZnO nanowire/p-polymer hybridized inorganic/organic ultraviolet light-emitting diode by piezo-phototronic effect, Nano Lett. 13, p. 607-613, 2013.
16. C. F. Pan, et al., High-resolution electroluminescent imaging of pressure distribution using a piezoelectric nanowire LED array, Nat. Photonics 7, p. 752-758, 2013.