SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
    Advertisers
SPIE Photonics West 2017 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Call for Papers

2017 SPIE Optics + Photonics | Call for Papers

Get Down (loaded) - SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS

SPIE PRESS




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Sensing & Measurement

Inspecting mask defects with through-focus scanning optical microscopy

Conventional optical microscopes can generate 3D data for economical, fast phase-defect analysis of masks used in extreme UV lithography.
8 August 2013, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201307.004964

An advanced technology that uses 13.5nm light, extreme UV (EUV) lithography uses mirrors and masks to pattern features 32nm wide or even smaller onto microchips, allowing the creation of denser and thus faster, more powerful computers. Before this technology can be widely applied, however, the industry must find a way to reduce the defect density of the masks.1 The sources of defects must be mitigated or eliminated at each step of the mask manufacturing process, which requires methods of identifying defects. Our research, with experimental results at visible wavelengths and simulations in the deep UV, suggests that 3D data sets from through-focus scanning optical microscopy (TSOM) could inexpensively provide information about buried defects that are either difficult or impossible to detect using current methods.

Mask defects can be categorized by whether they change the phase or amplitude of reflected EUV light. Amplitude defects are located on top or near the top of the multilayer mask structure. Phase defects, however, are generally formed either by the deposition of multiple layers over substrate defects (particles or pits) or by particles added during the multilayer deposition. Buried defects are harder to detect than surface defects.

Repair and mitigation techniques differ by defect type. Most commercial inspection tools, however, provide no information about amplitude or phase change. Characterization techniques such as electron microscopy, ion microscopy, or atomic force microscopy can provide information on surface topography but are unable to report the size and depth location of a defect underneath multiple layers. Also, electron and ion microscopes provide limited or no information about the core of the buried defects. Methods with unique capabilities, such as actinic inspection tools (AITs), exist but are limited in scope, purely experimental, resource intensive, and time consuming. Therefore, EUV mask development has a critical need for a low-cost, high-throughput technique that can detect a defect's size, depth, and type. This data is integral to the feedback cycle of defect repair mechanisms.


Figure 1. Construction of a through-focus scanning optical microscopy (TSOM) image using a conventional microscope. (a) Optical images are acquired at multiple heights, above and below the best focus position. (b) Images are stacked at their respective heights to form the 3D optical data set. (c) Optical intensity data extracted along a vertical cross section passing through the center of the target (a nanoparticle) is plotted as a 2D TSOM image.

Figure 2. Simulated TSOM images of (a) bump-type and (b) pit-type phase defects show color reversal. Both defects measure 21nm spherical-equivalent volume diameter. Simulation wavelength is 193nm.

One such recently developed technique is TSOM (see Figure 1).2–8 Conventionally, a single best-focus image is used for any type of optical analysis; blurry out-of-focus images are not considered optimal for high-precision applications. The TSOM method, however, demonstrates the usefulness of out-of-focus images for dimensional analysis. The concept of this method was first introduced in 2006.2 The set of through-focus optical images forms a 3D optical data set, which the TSOM method uses for 3D shape analysis of nanometer-scale targets.4, 5

Through-focus optical interactions commonly have distinct sensitivity to different variations in the physical dimensions of nanometer-scale targets. A TSOM image facilitates the analysis of these optical interactions. As a result, we used simulations to demonstrate for the first time that TSOM's through-focus 3D optical data offers excellent performance for detecting patterned defects as small as 5nm.6

TSOM demonstrated the potential to detect defects on EUV masks as small as 15nm and provide information about how they change the amplitude and phase of light. The technique may also be able to determine depth location. Figure 2(a) is a simulation, using optical imaging modeling software, of applying the TSOM method to detect a bump-type phase defect with a 21nm spherical-equivalent volume diameter (SEVD). Simulations indicate that the TSOM method should have sufficient signal strength over experimental noise to detect phase defects as small as 15nm SEVD using 193nm wavelength light. A pit defect exhibits a distinct color reversal in comparison to the bump defect, as shown in Figure 2(b), clearly distinguishing the two.

We substantiated these simulated TSOM results experimentally using a low-cost optical microscope operating at the visible wavelength of 520nm to identify defects on an EUV mask as bump-type. The same defects could not be detected using a scanning electron microscope due to the lack of depth contrast. Shifting to shorter wavelengths such as 193nm will improve the sensitivity of TSOM.

Nondestructively detecting the depth of buried defects (pits or particles) in a multilayer EUV stack is a challenging task, but the simulated TSOM images for such buried particle defects do show sensitivity to the depth of particles. This suggests the possibility of inferring the depth of defects within multilayered masks, which is essential information for defect repair schemes. We are in the process of validating experimentally the simulation results by building a controlled blank EUV mask test structure having particles of known size placed at different known depths in the multilayer structure. This validation will be extremely beneficial for the defect repair process, resulting in major savings in time and cost.

In summary, the TSOM method has the potential to detect phase defects on EUV masks as small as 15nm SEVD, distinguish pits from bumps, and infer the depth of buried particles. The TSOM method is economical because it requires only a 193nm optical microscope (which is inexpensive compared to an AIT), and has high throughput. As a result, TSOM appears to be a good candidate method for detecting defects on EUV lithography masks.


Ravikiran Attota
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Gaithersburg, MD

Ravikiran Attota is the principal investigator of the TSOM project at NIST. His interests include nanoscale 3D shape analysis, inspection and process monitoring for nanomanufacturing, and nanometrology using through-focus (3D) optical data. He received his PhD from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

Vibhu Jindal
SEMATECH
Albany, NY

Vibhu Jindal is currently managing multiple programs and projects at the SEMATECH Nanodefect Center. Previously, he was group leader of the EUV Mask Blank Defect Reduction Program. He received his BS and MS in materials science from the Indian Institute of Technology in Bombay, and a PhD in nanoscale science and engineering from the University of Albany, New York.


References:
1. http://www.nist.gov/pml/div683/conference/upload/Rice_2011.pdf  An overview of EUV mask metrology. Accessed 6 June 2011.
2. R. Attota, R. M. Silver, J. Potzick, Optical illumination and critical dimension analysis using the through-focus focus metric method, Proc. SPIE 6289, p. 62890Q, 2006. doi:10.1117/12.656421
3. R. Attota, T. A. Germer, R. M. Silver, Through-focus scanning-optical-microscope imaging method for nanoscale dimensional analysis, Opt. Lett. 33(17), p. 1990-1992, 2008. doi:10.1364/OL.33.001990
4. http://www.nist.gov/pml/div683/grp03/upload/tsom-ravikiran-attota.pdf An on-line presentation of the TSOM method with applications. Accessed 28 March 2011.
5. R. Attota, R. G. Dixson, J. A. Kramar, J. E. Potzick, A. E. Vladár, B. Bunday, E. Novak, A. Rudack, TSOM method for semiconductor metrology, Proc. SPIE 7971, p. 79710T, 2011. doi:10.1117/12.881620
6. A. Arceo, B. Bunday, V. Vartanian, R. Attota, Patterned defect and CD metrology by TSOM beyond the 22-nm node, Proc. SPIE 8324, p. 83240E, 2012. doi:10.1117/12.917236
7. A. Arceo, B. Bunday, R. Attota, Use of TSOM for sub-11nm node pattern defect detection and HAR features, Proc. SPIE 8681, p. 86812G, 2013. doi:10.1117/12.2013777
8. R. Attota, B. Bunday, V. Vartanian, Critical dimension metrology by through-focus scanning optical microscopy beyond the 22 nm node, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(22), p. 222107, 2013. doi:10.1063/1.4809512