SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:

SPIE Photonics West 2017 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Call for Papers

Get Down (loaded) - SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS


Print PageEmail PageView PDF


Thermoelectrical control of magnetic states on the nanoscale

Our investigations into electrical nanomanipulation of magnetic states demonstrate spontaneous magnetic, thermal, and electric oscillations at controllable frequencies.
12 July 2012, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201206.004257

Discovery of giant magnetoresistance1,2 by Albert Fert and Peter Grünberg in 1988 initiated a new technological concept: spin-based electronics, or spintronics. The challenge of manipulating magnetic states on the nanometer scale is central to this new branch of physics. The spin torque (ST) effect—which modulates the magnetization direction of a magnetic particle under an injection of spin-polarized electrons—is one possible solution that has since become a subject of intense study.3–5

Large current densities needed to achieve sufficient ST are accompanied by Joule heating, imposing a limit on the applicability of the ST effect. However, the fact that such heating can be precisely controlled by applying voltage opens up new possibilities for thermoelectric manipulation of the magnetic state, as we have predicted and experimentally observed.6–8 This novel control method works for a broad range of scenarios, including one in which the ST effect is absent.

Figure 1 shows the system we considered. We assumed that the Curie temperature Tc(1) of layer 1 is lower than Tc(0, 2) of layers 0 and 2. The magnetostatic field H is weak enough that, at low temperatures T, the magnetization of layer 2 is kept parallel to the magnetization of layer 0 due to the ‘exchange spring’ interaction of region 1.

Figure 1. Orientation of the magnetic moments M (shown with short arrows) in a stack of three ferromagnetic layers (0, 1, 2) of separation L1 (between layers 0 and 1) and L2 (1 and 2). The magnetic field H is shown with a long arrow. The magnetization in layer 0 is fixed. Θ: Tilt angle.

Figure 2. Dependence of the tilt angle Θon temperature T. Tc(1 )is the Curie temperature of layer 1 and Tc(or)the critical temperature.

The top right of Figure 1 shows how an increase in the tilt angle θ in such a structure increases the exchange spring energy and decreases the total magnetic energy. We proposed that an increase of T results in an orientational phase transition. Indeed, the exchange interaction depends not only on the exchange energy integral, but on the magnitude of the magnetic moment. Therefore, an increase in T decreases M1(T) and weakens the exchange spring coupling between layers 0 and 2. At critical temperature Tc(or), at which the exchange spring energy and the magnetic energy are equal, the parallel orientation of the magnetic moments loses its stability, and the magnetization of layer 2 starts to tilt. Further increasing T leads to M2 reversibly approaching the parallel orientation with respect to the magnetic field at T=Tc(1). We have validated this model both analytically and experimentally.7, 8

Figure 3. The dependence of the resistance R on (a) current J (experimental) and (b) on the bath temperature T (numerical calculations).

Figure 4. The steady-state current voltage characteristic of the stack (thick dark blue line) and spontaneous oscillations of the current J(t) and the voltage drop over the stack ~V(t) (here t is time). J(t) and ~V(t) develop from the initial state toward the limiting cycle (thick blue closed line) along which they execute a periodic motion. At J=Jcand ~V=Vc, the stack is Joule heated to the temperature T=Tc(1 ).

Figure 2 shows the temperature dependence of tilt angle θ on θ(T). This allows the control of charge transport through the stack due to the dependence of magnetoresistance R(θ) on tilt angle θ either by changing the temperature or by Joule heating the stack with current J—in this case T=T(J)—as shown in Figure 3. In particular, the current-voltage characteristic (IVC) can be either N-shaped or S-shaped.7, 9 If a stack with an N-shaped IVC is incorporated in a circuit having large enough inductance Λ>Λcr≈10−8÷10−7 H and biased by a dc voltage V, temporal voltage oscillations spontaneously arise across the stack as ~V(t), J(t), θ(t), and T(t). Figure 4 shows how this occurs. The frequency of these oscillations can be controlled by a change of Λ from essentially dc to gigahertz. For the S-shaped IVC the spontaneous oscillations arise if the capacitance in the circuit C>Ccr≈10−11÷10−10F (here, C is capacitance, Ccr is critical capacitance, and F is farad.)

Our investigations also show that space-periodic magnetic structures can be electrically induced in the system if the layers are long enough.10 Most of the current research on magnetic multilayer materials and their device applications relies on conventional equilibrium electron transport. We next plan to use electrically controlled spin-polarized currents in highly non-equilibrium regimes with respect to energy and temperature, hence ‘spin-thermo-electronics’ (STELE). Another issue is the large amount of heat generated in nanoscale devices, which today is one of the most fundamental obstacles to device miniaturization. To overcome this, we plan to turn the problem around by instead using electrically controlled local heating of magnetic nanostructures to achieve fundamentally new functionality, with potential applications in new types of spin valves, oscillators, and memory elements.

Financial support from the European Commission (grant FP7-ICT-2007-C, project 225955 STELE), the Swedish Research Council, and the Korean World Class University program funded by the Korean Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology/National Research Foundation (R31-2008-000-10057-0) is gratefully acknowledged.

Anatoly M. Kadigrobov, Robert Shekhter, Mats Jonson
Department of Physics
University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, Sweden
Sebastian Andersson, Vladislav Korenivski
Nanostructure Physics
Royal Institute of Technology
Stockholm, Sweden
Danko Radić
Department of Physics
Faculty of Science
University of Zagreb
Zagreb, Croatia

1. G. Salis, Y. Kato, K. Ensslin, D. C. Driscoll, Electrical control of spin coherence in semiconductor nanostructures, Nature 414, p. 619, 2001.
2. M. N. Baibich, J. M. Broto, A. Fert, Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, p. 2472, 1988.
3. J. C. Slonczewski, Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, p. L1, 1996.
4. J. C. Slonczewski, Excitation of spin waves by an electric current, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, p. L261, 1999.
5. L. Berger, Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current, Phys. Rev. B 54, p. 9353, 1996.
6. A. M. Kadigrobov, R. I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, V. Korenivski, Current-induced magnetic superstructures in exchange-spring devices, Phys. Rev. B 74, p. 195307, 2006.
7. A. M. Kadigrobov, S. Andersson, D. Radić, R. I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, V. Korenivski, Dynamics of current induced magnetic superstructures in exchange-spring devices, J. Appl. Phys. 107, p. 123706, 2010.
8. S. Andersson, V. Korenivski, Spin torques in point contacts to exchange-biased ferromagnetic films, IEEE Trans. Magn. 46, p. 2140, 2010.
9. A. M. Kadigrobov, S. Andersson, H. C. Pak, D. Radić, R. I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, V. Korenivski, Thermal-magnetic-electric oscillator based on spin-valve effect, J. Appl. Phys. 111, p. 044315, 2012.
10. A. M. Kadigrobov, R. I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, Current-induced magnetic superstructures in exchange-spring devices, arXiv:1201.1514v1, 2012.