SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:

SPIE Photonics West 2017 | Register Today

SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Call for Papers

Get Down (loaded) - SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS


Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Solar & Alternative Energy

New electret charging technique for energy harvesting

A low-cost technique offers a way to charge electrets by effectively generating ions using a negative ion air purifier.
5 July 2012, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201206.004226

During the last decade, the power requirements of portable electronic devices have steadily increased, and are predicted to exceed the capacity of conventional secondary batteries in future. As a result, micro power generation systems that could replace these batteries have begun to receive significant attention.1

While electromagnetic induction is not suitable for very small power generators, electrostatic induction offers numerous advantages, such as a simple structure and high output voltage at relatively slow speeds. A promising area is the use of electrostatic induction with an electret, which is a dielectric material with a semi-permanent charge.2 Here, we present a method of using low-cost equipment to charge electrets. We have been able to generate large potentials with very good long-term stability. The highest charge density achieved was 32.99mC/m2 for silicon dioxide (SiO2) and 2.61mC/m2 for Cytop, an amorphous fluoropolymer.3

Electrets have been used as key components in microphones, power generators, and so on in an effort to save on the operating power supply of such devices.2 Our method uses a new charging technique for SiO24 and Cytop5 electrets using a negative ion air purifier, which can generate ions very effectively up to 2.1 trillion ions/cm3. The air purifier apparatus, which produces both positive and negative air ions, can be used to reduce electrostatic charges on various objects, such as semiconductor wafers and dies during the fabrication process.6 This unit operates directly from a standard 120V AC power source. After connecting to any AC line, the negative ions are emitted by the four-needle emitter assembly with an ion output of 20 trillion ions/s and particle effectiveness as small as 0.1μm at 2.9cm from the emitter.7

The setup consists of multiple parallel needles located a few millimeters above the sample surface, approximately 2±1mm. Three negative ion generators means that each one has four needles for charging the wafer (4 inch), as well as a DC spinner. The motor is fixed on a base so that it can be used for wafer rotation during charging. The SiO2 wafer should be fixed to the plate by a steel clip during rotation to avoid cracking and to ensure a good connection between the plate and the wafer. The plate is made from aluminum (because of its near-perfect conductivity) and is fixed to the shaft of the motor. The wafer is connected to the ground to avoid double polarities (e.g., negative polarity only). The housing is made from plexiglass for isolation and safety, including holes to allow in fresh air during charging (ionization) (see Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1. Schematic of the multiple ionizer. As samples are charged, the needles of the negative ion generator are perpendicular to the wafer. GND: Ground. Alu-Plate: Aluminum plate.

Figure 2. Charging an electret using a negative ion generator. Top: The entire setup. Bottom: The needles are perpendicular to the wafer with an equal distance between them for enhanced homogeneity.

Samples were either oxidized with a thickness between 0.5 and 1.5μm or spin-coated with 7.1–11.0μm Cytop. A maximum charge density of 32.99mC/m2 was achieved for SiO2 and 2.61mC/m2 for Cytop, approximately twice that obtained by corona charging. In addition, corona charging can only charge a small chip once (size 10×20mm2).8 Homogeneity depends on different parameters, such as charging time, wafer rotation during charge, and the thickness of the electrets. Consequently, SiO2 (standard deviation: σst=17.12V, maximum potential: −274V, mean: −247.33V) is more homogeneous than Cytop (standard deviation: σst=121.09V, maximum potential: −1000V, mean: −850.9V). The main parameter that determines homogeneity is wafer rotation during charging. In the case of an oxidized, 0.5μm-thick SiO2 layer, the standard deviation is σst=17.12V. By increasing the charging time under the same conditions, the standard deviation increases. For example, after 120 minutes of charging, the standard deviation becomes σst=94.67 for the same thickness (see Figure 3). In contrast, using three 120° wafer rotations during charging, without using a spinner, the standard deviation becomes σst=235.5V, with a SiO2 thickness of 1.5μm (see Figure 4).

Figure 3. The homogeneity for silicon dioxide (SiO2) (d=0.5μm, charging time: 120min, σst=94 .67V).

Figure 4. The homogeneity for SiO2 (d=1 .5 μm, charging time: 210min, σst=235 .5V).

Figure 5. Long-term stability of surface potential by the negative ion generator for SiO2and Cytop. The potential is normalized to the starting potential (max. value) directly after charging. Error bars indicate typical errors due to local potential variation. d: Thickness.

The long-term stability of the provided charge is essential when using a charging technique for energy harvesters. For SiO2, about 67% of the charge still remains after 150 days (thickness: 0.5μm). With a thickness of 1.5μm, the charge decreases more quickly, falling to 59% within 150 days. In the case of Cytop, 80% of the charge remains after 162 days (thickness: 11.0μm) (see Figure 5).

In summary, the technique presented here uses a negative ion generator to charge electrets and provides excellent charging results. Compared to corona charging, the equipment used in our technique is both cheaper and safer. Our multiple ionizer can charge a 4 inch wafer without scanning, and with good uniformity of surface potential. The maximum charge density for SiO2 (32.99mC/m2) is found to be about twice that of corona charging and Cytop (2.61mC/m2). A disadvantage of the presented design is a mechanical sensitivity that results in low yield in the fabrication process. To improve the yield, we plan to decrease this sensitivity.

Awad Saad
Hochschule Furtwangen University
Furtwangen, Germany

Awad Saad holds a master's degree in microsystems engineering from Hochschule Furtwangen University. Since October 2007, he has been a teacher's assistant in the Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechatronics, MISR University for Science and Technology, Egypt.

1. C. B. Williams, Feasibility study of a vibration powered micro-electric generator, IEEE Colloq. Compact Power Sources, p. 7, 1996.
2. Y. Arakawa, Micro seismic power generator using electret polymer film, Proc. PowerMEMS , p. 187-190, 2004.
3. B. M. A. Nimo U. Mescheder, A. Saad, 3D capacitive vibrational micro harvester using isotropic charging of electrets deposited on vertical sidewalls, Proc. SPIE 8066, p. 80661Q, 2011.
4. P. Günther, Charging, long-term stability, and TSD measurements of SiO2 electrets, IEEE Trans. Elec. Insul., p. 137-141, 1988.
5. http://www.agc.com/english/chemicals/shinsei/cytop/about.html Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., product information on Cytop. Accessed 9 June 2012.
6. L. W. Partridge, Air ionizer with static balance control, US Patent 6,693,788 B1, 2001.
7. http://www.seawiseion.com/SW1200.jpg Seawise Ionization Technology Ltd., SW1200 ionizer specification sheet. Accessed 10 June 2012.
8. T. Tsutsumino, Y. Suzuki, N. Kasagi, Y. Sakane, Seismic power generator using high-performance polymer electret, Proc. 19th IEEE Int'l Conf. MEMS, p. 98-101, 2006.