SPIE Startup Challenge 2015 Founding Partner - JENOPTIK Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Register Today

OPIE 2017

OPIC 2017




Print PageEmail PageView PDF


Turbulence characterization with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor

Hartmann sensor data can reveal rapid variation in optical-turbulence coherence length and produce estimates of the Greenwood frequency and inner scale.
14 December 2010, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1201011.003316

In the field of optical atmospheric propagation, knowledge of optical-turbulence strength and other key statistical parameters is crucial for performance prediction and system design. Hartmann-sensor data can be used to reliably estimate the essential parameters characterizing optical turbulence, including the Fried coherence length (r0), the Greenwood frequency (fG, a measure of the temporal turbulence bandwidth due to wind or beam slewing), and the inner scale of turbulence (ℓ0). The earliest approaches for estimating r0 were based on modulation-transfer-function (MTF) measurements.1 This requires accurate calibration and stability of the system MTF, which is often problematic. Astronomers have used differential motion (DIMM: differential image-motion monitor) and scintillation to measure ‘seeing’ conditions.2 (In astronomy, seeing refers to the blurring of images caused by moving air cells in the Earth's atmosphere.) Others have used the slope-structure function estimated from a Hartmann wavefront sensor, principally for r0 estimation.3

It is well known that r0−5/3 is proportional to the variances of quantities related to the optical phase. For example, one could estimate r0 from the variance of the focus mode in aberration, the tilt, or the total phase. In general, a quite general form for an r0 estimator is where Xk is some finite set of random variables, such as scaled Zernike coefficients or scaled slope measurements from a Hartmann sensor. These are scaled because the proportionality constants have been absorbed into the definition of each Xk. We have shown that the slope discrepancy4,5 (or rotational component) of the slopes from a Hartmann wavefront sensor provides a very effective estimator of this general form. In this case, the vector [Xk] consists of the x- and y-slope-discrepancy (or circulation) component of the measured Hartmann slopes. We developed a high-resolution, high-frame-rate, mobile sensor to use these estimation techniques (see Figure 1). It is mounted on a shock-isolation system inside a small trailer. The sensor consists of a 32×32 Hartmann array with 18×18 pixels2 per subaperture, imaged through a 40cm telescope. This provides a large linear range for open-loop measurements. Data can be captured at a maximum rate of 8639 frames/s. This high data rate is important for temporal-structure-function and noise calculations.

Figure 1.Mobile turbulence sensor.

The estimation error from Equation (1) is readily obtained. If we assume that each Xk is a normal, random variable with zero mean, then r0−5/3 is a χ2 random variable and the estimation error can be derived from the covariance of the vector process. The error will be inversely proportional to the statistical number of degrees of freedom (NDOF). Table 1 lists the NDOFs for typical quantities derived from Hartmann-sensor measurements. The slope discrepancy and differential tilt (i.e., the rms difference of tilts in two adjacent subapertures) have very high NDOF values, resulting in r0 estimation errors of less than 5%. Noise will reduce the NDOF of a given process, but noise-removal techniques can be applied to both differential tilt and slope discrepancy.

Table 1.Number of statistical degrees of freedom for quantities commonly derived from Hartmann-sensor measurements, calculated for a 32×32 array of 700 Hartmann subapertures. g tilt: Tilt derived from gradient measurements produced by the subapertures. The phases and tilt angles are given in arbitrary units.
Statistical quantityDegrees of freedom
Reconstructed phase2.58
Tilt-removed reconstructed phase10.1
Sensor g tilts19.1
Full aperture tilt-removed g tilts96.9
Slope discrepancy416
Differential tilt832

Figures 2 and 3 represent r0 estimates at a wavelength of 633nm, based on differential tilt and slope discrepancy, for very high and moderate-to-weak levels of turbulence, respectively. The data in Figure 2 was taken over a dry creek bed with an optical path of 740m, while that in Figure 3 was collected in a parking lot with a range of 45m. In both cases, significant variation in r0 levels are observed over relatively short times. Because of the small estimation errors for slope discrepancy and differential tilt, these large changes imply significant variation in the underlying turbulence strength. This type of variation was not atypical in our measurements.

Figure 2.Time-varying coherence length (r0) for strong turbulence.

Figure 3.Time-varying r0 for moderate-to-weak turbulence.

The Greenwood frequency can be obtained from the temporal phase-structure function.4 The structure function, DΦ(τ), for a spatial phase Φ(t) and small time separation, τ, is By reconstructing the phase from each frame, the phase-structure function can be estimated as a function of frame separation. Special care must be taken to handle the noise (see Figure 4). The raw, reconstructed phase-structure function does not exhibit the 5/3 power-law asymptote because of the effects of measurement noise. The noise (both signal noise and turbulence-measurement error caused by sensor-fitting error) can be estimated using the slope-discrepancy structure function. When this noise-structure function is subtracted from the reconstructed phase-structure function, the 5/3 power law emerges and fG can be estimated from any point on this asymptote. For this data, fG=9.8Hz.

Figure 4.Noise-corrected phase-structure function. fG: Greenwood frequency. SD: Slope discrepancy. τ: Time separation.

We also developed a technique for estimating the inner scale of turbulence based on the Hill-spectrum assumption.6 This technique uses ratios of statistical quantities derived from the sensor data. Estimates of ℓ0 from near-ground horizontal paths are between 3 and 5mm.

In summary, a high-spatial- and temporal-resolution Hartmann sensor can produce extremely reliable estimates of r0 and fG. Field results have illustrated rapid variation in r0 on short timescales. This type of behavior will not be captured with an MTF or DIMM sensor. Knowledge of rapid temporal turbulence variation is significant for modeling of propagation and adaptive-optics performance. Modeling based on average r0 values will not capture the rapid increases in turbulence that can produce strong performance fades. The field results to date have been limited to relatively short-range horizontal paths near the ground. We will next extend our experiments to a broader set of propagation conditions.

Terry J. Brennan
The Optical Sciences Company
Anaheim, USA

Terry Brennan is a senior scientist. He has been involved with the Optical Sciences Company in adaptive-optics research and turbulence characterization for over 20 years.