Vibrational spectroscopy of chemical warfare agents

The infrared and Raman spectral signatures of chemical threat agents can be used to develop remote sensing chemical-warfare detection systems.
25 October 2007
Samuel P. Hernández-Rivera, Orlando Ruiz-Pesante, Oliva M. Primera-Pedrozo, Leonardo C. Pacheco-Londoño, William Ortiz, Michael L. Ramirez, Yadira M. Soto-Feliciano and Deborah E. Nieves

Countering potential terrorist attacks requires a diversified array of detection capabilities designed for a wide range of deployment scenarios.1,2 There is also increased awareness concerning the vulnerability of civilian food and water supplies to deliberate contamination by chemical warfare agents (CWAs), typically assumed to target only military personnel and installations. Hence the urgent need for analytical technologies capable of detecting a wide variety of CWAs as well as their hydrolysis and degradation products in complex environments.

Among the analytical techniques available for the detection and identification of chemical agents,2–11 vibrational spectroscopy (infrared or Raman) has the advantage of providing accurate chemical information. It also has a potential for remote sensing applications. Raman spectroscopy is especially useful due to its inherent ability to distinguish between molecules that have a high degree of similarity. In our work, we use vibrational spectroscopy to characterize CWAs and also seek to develop a remote sensing technology based on the Raman spectroscopic signature of these chemical threat compounds.

One of our approaches is based on acquiring the Raman spectra of CWAs and their degradation products using different excitation wavelengths. By varying the excitation at the same laser power, we can identify the laser line producing the best Raman signatures for the threat compounds studied. In a series of recently investigated chemical warfare agent simulants (CWASs), optimum excitation was achieved at a laser power of 25mW using the 488 and 532 nm lines. Typical spectra are shown in Figure 1 for 1,6-dichlorohexane.


Figure 1. Raman spectra of 1,6-dichlorohexane obtained at different excitation lines. Arb: Arbitrary.

Remote Raman telescope experiments were also performed on CWASs using 488nm-excitation at a distance of seven meters. We were able to record well-resolved single spectra of dimethyl methyl phosphonate as a function of laser power and integration time, as shown in Figure 2.


Figure 2. Raman spectra of dimethyl methyl phosphonate as a function of laser power (single acquisitions).

Infrared spectroscopy experiments were also carried out on trace compounds deposited on various surfaces. Figure 3 shows the fiber-optic coupled-grazing angle probe Fourier transform infrared (FOC-GAP-FTIR) spectra of 5 and 10μg/cm2 of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide deposited on a stainless steel surface. Results clearly show that limits of detection as low as nanograms/cm2 (milligrams/m2) are achievable. This methodology also has the advantage of being able to detect CWAs on surfaces as varied as metal, plastic, glass, wood and others.12–14


Figure 3. Fiber-optic coupled Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES) deposited on a stainless steel surface.

In other experiments, the spectra of CWAs and their degradation products were measured using Raman spectroscopy, liquid and gas phase FTIR, FOC-GAP-FTIR, as well as Raman excitation in the near infrared (785nm), visible (532, 514 and 488nm) and deep ultraviolet (244nm). The spectra yielded clear and strong signatures suitable for chemical detection in the near or far field, potentially leading to vehicle-borne or man-portable detection systems for use by defense and security agencies or combat troops. Further, we evaluated a method for the detection and quantification of chemical warfare agent simulants on surfaces as proof of concept. In addition, we showed that the technique could be used for the decontamination and cleaning validation processes of these highly toxic compounds.

This work was supported by the University Research Initiative (URI)- MURI Program of the U.S. Department of Defense under grant number DAAD19-02-1-0257. The authors also acknowledge contributions from the National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering (NACME) and the Chemical Imaging Center of the Chemistry Department at the University of Puerto Rico - Mayagüez.


Samuel P. Hernández-Rivera, Orlando Ruiz-Pesante, Oliva M. Primera-Pedrozo, Leonardo C. Pacheco-Londoño, William Ortiz, Michael L. Ramirez, Yadira M. Soto-Feliciano, Deborah E. Nieves
Center for Chemical Sensors Development,
University of Puerto Rico - Mayagüez Campus
Mayagüez, PR

Samuel P. Hernández-Rivera is the Director of the Center for Chemical Sensors Development at the University of Puerto Rico – Mayagüez.

Orlando Ruiz-Pesante is a member of the Center for Chemical Sensors Development at the same university. The focal point of the research carried out at the Center is the detection of chemical threat agents such as explosives, as well as of biological agents and toxic industrial compounds for defense and security applications.


References:
Recent News
PREMIUM CONTENT
Sign in to read the full article
Create a free SPIE account to get access to
premium articles and original research