SPIE Digital Library Get updates from SPIE Newsroom
  • Newsroom Home
  • Astronomy
  • Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
  • Defense & Security
  • Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
  • Illumination & Displays
  • Lasers & Sources
  • Micro/Nano Lithography
  • Nanotechnology
  • Optical Design & Engineering
  • Optoelectronics & Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensing & Measurement
  • Solar & Alternative Energy
  • Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
  • Information for:
    Advertisers
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing 2017 | Register Today

OPIE 2017

OPIC 2017

SPIE Journals OPEN ACCESS

SPIE PRESS

SPIE PRESS




Print PageEmail PageView PDF

Nanotechnology

Photonic crystals reduce the size of optical sensors

Simulations reveal that the dispersive properties of photonic-crystal structures can create chip-scale optical sensors to detect chemical, biological, and gaseous agents.
15 November 2006, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200610.0413

Today, sensors play fundamental roles in many applications, including automotive safety, consumer gadgets, defense and homeland security, environmental monitoring, household appliances, and medical equipment. Among the various kinds of sensors, opto-chemical devices make up an important class.1 In particular, Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZI)—invented in 1891 by physicists Ernst Mach and Ludwig Zehnder—create effective chemical sensors with high sensitivities. In these devices, a material in the sensor path induces a phase shift that changes the output power at two detectors due to the interference of the beams (see Figure 1).


Figure 1. In a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI), the incident beam is split into a reference path and a sensor path and then recombined. A change in the effective refractive index in the sensor path results in a phase shift that alters the output power at detectors 1 and 2.

A typical MZI sensor requires precise alignment of four optical elements: two beam splitters and two mirrors. For this reason integrated optical components have been used to fabricate MZIs with lateral dimensions on the order of centimeters. A typical integrated-optical MZI biochemical sensor can measure the change in the sensor path length caused by the interaction of the evanescent optical field with a film that captures, or reacts with, a particular analyte. To create increased specificity or to detect multiple chemistries, an array of sensors with varying films is used. We have engineered the unique dispersive properties of photonic-crystal (PhC) structures to create a robust yet compact array of micro-scale Mach-Zehnder optical sensors.2

PhCs are periodic-dielectric structures that manipulate the propagation of electromagnetic waves, much like semiconductors direct the flow of electrons. Moreover, PhCs possess a photonic bandgap, which means that light of certain wavelengths cannot propagate through them. Additionally, the structures can possess unique dispersion characteristics that enable the structures to behave like a lens or superprism.3

We use software and hardware acceleration tools to optimize a PhC's dispersion characteristics for use in optical sensors. An example of a PhC structure with such desirable characteristics is a square lattice of air columns in silicon with pitch a, a radius of 0.26a, and a refractive index of 3.5 (see Figure 2). By examining the unit cell of the structure with software based on the plane-wave method, we can calculate the dispersion surfaces that indicate the allowed wavevectors (kx,ky), as a function of normalized frequency or wavelength.4 By slicing the dispersion contours at fixed frequencies, we can show that this structure has the equal frequency contours (EFCs) for a transverse-electrical (TE) optical beam (Figure 3).


Figure 2. This two-dimensional photonic-crystal (PhC) structure consists of a square lattice of air columns in silicon.

Figure 3. For the structure shown in Figure 2, Our software computed the equal frequency contours as the normalized frequency varied from 0.2 to 0.3a/λ for a transverse-electrical (TE) optical mode.

The group velocity vector—which, by definition, is normal to the dispersion surface or EFCs—governs the direction of light propagation within PhC structures.5 The square pattern of the EFCs at a normalized frequency of 0.26a/λ results in most incident wave vectors traveling north-south or east-west in the structure. This is known as the self-collimation effect, and it allows a narrow beam to propagate within a PhC lattice without any significant broadening. This effect was first experimentally demonstrated in 1999, 5 and it can be used for wave guiding and the dense routing of optical signals.6 Using the self-collimating silicon-PhC structure shown in Figure 2, and adding PhC mirrors and a one-row beam splitter, we designed a compact MZI sensor (see Figure 4).2 The beam splitter is designed to equally split the optical signal and cuts diagonally through the device. Two PhC mirrors—one in the upper right corner and another in the lower left—direct the beams to the output ports. If half of the MZI is exposed to a gas or liquid and the other half is protected from the material under test, the MZI becomes a relative-refractive index sensor. In this particular device, the MZI is 12 × 2μm with a path length of 24μm for each branch. These dimensions are approximately three orders of magnitude less than commercial integrated-optic MZIs.


Figure 4. This MZI sensor includes a beam splitter and mirrors embedded in a self-collimating PhC structure. A 2μm wide TE Gaussian beam with a wavelength of 1.538μm is launched from the left of the structure. Perfectly matched layers (PML) lie on each side.

Figure 5 shows the steady-state amplitude of the electromagnetic field in the sensor, as the refractive index in the air columns in the lower part of the sensor varied: 1.0 (baseline), 1.1, and 1.2. The simulation area is 30μm wide and 22μm tall, with a 10nm (∼λ0/150) cell size—resulting in a mesh with 6.6 million nodes (3000 × 2200). Each side includes 100 perfectly matching layers, each being 1μm thick. We performed the simulations with our EMPLab™ software, accelerated with an integrated, graphics card-based, finite-difference time domain (FDTD) engine. This engine and sample files are available for free download from the EM Photonics website (see author information). The accelerator computed the simulation in less than 14min—roughly 270 times faster than MATLAB® code, which took roughly 60 hours. The increased computing power enables the modeling of numerous configurations to optimize a device. Figure.6 is a plot of the relative power at the two output ports of our MZI sensor as the refractive index in the lower part of the interferometer is varied from 1.0 (air) to 1.5.


Figure 5. (a) At the baseline condition—or a refractive index of 1.0 in the columns in the lower half of the sensor—Hz amplitude plots show an electromagnetic (EM) field at the right port. (b) With the lower half of the sensor's refractive index at 1.1, an EM fields appears from both ports. (c) With the refractive index at 1.2, an EM field comes out of the bottom port.

Figure 6. This graph shows the simulated performance of an MZI sensor as the refractive index in the lower half of the device varied from 1.0 to 1.5.

In conclusion, our MZI sensor relies on self-collimation and a PhC beam splitter to guide light in a two-dimensional structure. The roughly 12μm by 12μm MZI sensor can detect a refractive-index shift of less than 0.01 (see Figure 6). The sensitivity of the sensor could be improved by enlarging the device and/or incorporating PhC structures that can slow down the propagation of the light.7 On the other hand, the micron-scale dimensions of our device allow the fabrication of low-weight, compact, dense, and highly parallel sensors. By adding further beam splitters, but using the same optical source, multiple MZI sensors could be fabricated in parallel to sense multiple biological or chemical agents.

The authors acknowledge John Humphrey and Dan Price of EM Photonics for their efforts in the development of the graphical-processing-unit accelerated FDTD solver.


Authors
Richard Martin, Ahmed Sharkawy, Eric Kelmelis
EM Photonics Inc.
Newark, DE

Richard Martin is a senior research engineer with EM Photonics. Including stints at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and W.L. Gore and Associates, he has more than 20 years of experience in sensors, optoelectronics systems, and photonic devices. In 2005, he joined EM Photonics to focus on novel nano-photonic devices and millimeter-wave imaging systems.

Ahmed Sharkawy is the director of photonic applications at EM Photonics. He holds five patents, and he has has published more than 20 technical papers, four book chapters, and a book that will be published in 2007. During his PhD, he focused on the design and analysis of periodic-photonic devices. His research interests include electromagnetic numerical modeling and modeling nanophotonic devices, antennae, and metamaterials.

Eric Kelmelis is currently the vice president of EM Photonics. As such, he has worked through the various stages required for development of nano-photonic devices, including modeling and simulation-tool development, device design, and component fabrication. His other interests include hardware-accelerated computing and millimeter-wave imaging. He has presented at several SPIE conferences, including Optics and Photonics, the Defense and Security Symposium, and Photonics West.


References:
1. Paul V. Lambeck, Integrated opto-chemical sensors, Sens. Actuators B: Chemical, Vol: 8, no. 1, pp. 103-116, 1992. doi:10.1016/0925-4005(92)85016-P
2. R. Martin, A. Sharkawy, J. Humphrey, E. J. Kelmelis, D. W. Prather, Integrated optical chemical sensor using a dispersion guided photonic crystal structure, Proc. SPIE 6322, pp. 63220I, 2006.
3. J. Witzens, M. Loncar, A. Scherer, Self-collimation in planar photonic crystals, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron, Vol: 8, no. 6, pp. 1246-1257, 2002. doi:10.1109/JSTQE.2002.806693
4. S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, Block-iterative frequency-domain methods for Maxwell's equations in a planewave basis, Opt. Express, Vol: 8, pp. 173-180, 2001.
5. H. Kosaka, T. Kawashima, A. Tomita, M. Notomi, T. Tamamra, T. Sato, S. Kawakami, Self-collimating phenomena in photonic crystals, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol: 74, no. 9, pp. 1212-1214, 1999. doi:10.1063/1.123502
6. D. W. Prather, S. Shi, D. Pustai, C. Chen, S. Venkataraman, A. Sharkawy, G. Schneider, J. Murakowski, Dispersion-based optical routing in photonic crystals, Opt. Lett., Vol: 29, no. 1, pp. 50-52, 2004. doi:10.1364/OL.29.000050
7. M. Soljacic, S. Johnson, S. Fan, M. Ibanescu, E. Ippen, J. D. Joannopoulos, Photonic-crystal slow-light enhancement of nonlinear phase sensitivity, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, Vol: 19, no. 9, pp. 2052-2059, 2002.