 Astronomy
 Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
 Defense & Security
 Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
 Illumination & Displays
 Lasers & Sources
 Micro/Nano Lithography
 Nanotechnology
 Optical Design & Engineering
 Optoelectronics & Communications
 Remote Sensing
 Sensing & Measurement
 Solar & Alternative Energy
 Sign up for Newsroom EAlerts
 Information for:
Advertisers




Nanotechnology
Modeling the optical properties of nanoparticles
Gunnar A. Niklasson
Recent advances in modeling the unique optical properties of nanoparticles and nanocomposites pave the way for designing and modeling coatings.
20 April 2006, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200603.0182
The optical properties of nanoparticles are important for both traditional and emerging technologies. Nanoparticles have long been used as coloring agents in glass and paints. Research on nanoparticle optics soared in the 1970s, due to the increased societal interest in solarenergy applications. Today, metallic nanoparticles are used in commercial coatings that absorb at particular solar wavelengths. Recently, the optical absorption of noble metal nanoparticles has been employed as the basis for novel sensors: the enhanced local fields close to particle surfaces makes it possible to detect single molecules by surfaceenhanced spectroscopy.^{1}
When designing optical coatings, it is vital to have accurate models of their optical properties. Nanoparticlebased coatings can be optimized for specific applications by modifying their particle size, shape, volume fraction, micro structure, etc. Because the optics of nanoparticles is a complex subject, different classes of models are needed in different situations. We have developed a comprehensive set of working models for submicron particles embedded in supporting media. We also carried out experimental studies on metalinsulator composite solarabsorbing coatings, nanostructured transparent conductors, pigmented polymers, and paint coatings. The experimental results were closely related to the predictions of the appropriate theoretical models.
Figure 1 gives a qualitative picture of regions of validity for three different nanoparticleoptics models: the effectivemedium region, the independentscattering region, and the dependentscattering region. Coatings that contain particles much smaller than the wavelength of light can be modeled by effectivemedium theories.^{2,3} In this case, we can conveniently use electrostatics to model the optical properties of the composite. The coating is modeled as a homogeneous ‘effective medium’ with effective optical properties.
Figure 1. The optics of nanoparticle coatings can be predicted using three different models, depending on the size of the particles and their density. We assume that the particles are placed in a simple cubic structure. The size parameter is defined as 2πR/λ, where R is the radius and λ is the wavelength of light.
For larger particles, both scattering and absorption are important, and multiple scattering must be taken into account.^{3} In the independentscattering approximation, the coating material is characterized by effective scattering and absorption coefficients that are obtained by summing up the contributions from each particle. This approximation is restricted to dilute media, so each particle scatter slight independently of the others.
The third region lies between the two extremes. In dense media, dependent scattering effects become important.^{4} In this case, a full solution of Maxwell's equations for the appropriate structure is necessary.
Effectivemedium theories (EMT) can be used for visible light when the particle size is roughly 1020nm or smaller. More rigorous limits of validity can be obtained for specific material combinations and wavelength ranges by computations.^{2} One conceptual problem is that no unique solution exists because the EMTs are sensitivelydependent on the detailed arrangement of the nanoparticles. EMTs developed for simple model microstructures provide good approximations in many cases. The two most common are the MaxwellGarnett model for particles randomly embedded in a homogeneous matrix material, and the Bruggeman model for a random mixture of two kinds of particles.^{2,3} These cases often provide good working models for applied work. Fractal particle aggregates are special cases that can be treated by electricalimpedancenetwork analogues.^{5}
The twodimensional problem of particles sitting on a substrate surface is more difficult because interactions with image charges in the substrate cannot be ignored. However, the problem has been treated in excellent work by the Leyden group,^{6} which is regrettably littleused by the optics community.
Our multiplescattering approach for composite coatings on a substrate is based on the fourflux approximation, which considers the scattering and absorption of direct and diffuse light beams propagating through the coating. The scattering and absorption of single particles are computed exactly and used as inputs to the model. The theory is phenomenological, however, and contains several adjustable parameters. We have systematically employed orderofscattering expansions to develop methods to calculate these parameters.^{7} This has led to more rigorous versions of the fourflux theory.^{8}
Dependent scattering occurs when the distance between adjacent particles is less than about 0.3 times the wavelength.^{4} This occurs for homogeneouslydistributed particles at high volume fractions, as shown in Figure 1. Dependent scattering models are also needed when nanoparticles stick to one another and form large aggregates. In this case we must find rigorous solutions for the electromagnetic field that take into account interference between fields scattered by different particles. Many numerical techniques have been developed and calculations for model structures containing several hundred particles are today common. A number of pieces of computer code to do this are publicly available.
Our understanding of the optical properties of nanoparticles and nanocomposites has increased considerably in recent years. This has been very useful for our research in nanostructured optical coatings. Our applied work concentrates on optical coatings in applications related to energy efficiency. Selectivesolarabsorber coatings such as NiAl_{2}O_{3} and NiNiO employ nanometersize metal particles embedded in a dielectric.^{9} Their optical properties can be accurately modeled by EMT, which also can be used as a design tool. Figure 2 shows the excellent agreement between experimental optical data and EMT modeling, which has been obtained for porous transparent conducting coatings consisting of tindoped indiumoxide nanoparticles.^{10} We also used fourflux theory to optimize solarabsorbing paints, with respect to pigment material and particle size as well as film thickness.^{11} These are only a few examples of the use of stateoftheart models for the optical properties of nanostructured materials in optical modeling and coating design.
Figure 2. The reflectance and transmittance of a porous coating consisting of 16nmdiameter nanoparticles of tindoped indium oxide (ITO) are shown as a function of wavelength.^{10} Excellent agreement is found between experiments and the effectivemedium theory for a mixture of ITO and air.
Author
Gunnar A. Niklasson
Department of Engineering Sciences, The Ångströ Laboratory Uppsala University
Uppsala, Sweden
Gunnar A. Niklasson is professor of solid state physics, with emphasis on solar energy materials, at the Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University.
References:
1. H. Xu, E.J. Bjerneld, M. Käll, L. Börjesson,, Spectroscopy of Single Hemoglobin Molecules by Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering,
Phys. Rev. Lett.,
Vol: 83, pp. 4357, 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4357
2. G.A. Niklasson, C.G. Granqvist, Optical properties and solar selectivity of coevaporated CoAl_{2}O_{3} composite films,
J. Appl. Phys.,
Vol: 55, pp. 3382, 1984.
3. G.A. Niklasson, Optical properties of inhomogeneous twocomponent materials,
Materials science for solar energy conversion systems,
pp. 743, 1991.
4. C.L. Tien, B.L. Drolen, Thermal radiation in particulate media with dependent and independent scattering,
Annual review of numerical fluid mechanics and heat transfer 1,
pp. 132, 1987.
5. J.A. Sotelo, V.N. Pustovit, G.A. Niklasson, Optical constants of gold blacks: Fractal network models and experimental data,
Phys. Rev. B,
Vol: 65, pp. 245113, 2002.
6. D. Bedeaux, J. Vlieger,
Optical properties of surfaces,
2001.
7. W.E. Vargas, G.A. Niklasson, Generalized method for evaluating scattering parameters used in radiative transfer models,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A,
Vol: 14, pp. 2243, 1997.
8. W.E. Vargas, Generalized fourflux radiative transfer model,
Appl. Opt.,
Vol: 37, pp. 2615, 1998.
9. E. Wäckelgård, G.A. Niklasson, C.G. Granqvist, Selectively solarabsorbing coatings,
Solar Energy: The state of the art,
pp. 109144, 2001.
10. J. Ederth, A. Hultåker, G.A. Niklasson, P. Heszler, A.R. van Doorn, M.J. Jongerius, D. Burgard, C.G. Granqvist, Thin Porous Indium Tin Oxide Nanoparticle Films: Effects of Annealing in Vacuum,
Appl. Phys. A,
Vol: 81, pp. 1363, 2005. doi:10.1007/s0033900532647


