- Biomedical Optics & Medical Imaging
- Defense & Security
- Electronic Imaging & Signal Processing
- Illumination & Displays
- Lasers & Sources
- Micro/Nano Lithography
- Optical Design & Engineering
- Optoelectronics & Communications
- Remote Sensing
- Sensing & Measurement
- Solar & Alternative Energy
- Sign up for Newsroom E-Alerts
- Information for:
Lasers & Sources
High-power semiconductor lasers make mid-infrared wavelengths accessible
This article discusses recent technological improvements that have led to high-power room-temperature diode lasers in in the mid-infrared (from 3µm to 8µm) wavelength range, which are useful for a number of industrial and military applications.
7 February 2006, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200601.0059
Diode lasers that emit at mid-infrared (from 3μm to 8μm) wavelengths may one day have a dramatic impact on applications such as biological and chemical spectroscopy systems,1 directed infrared military countermeasure systems,2 and free space optical communication systems.3 Diode lasers are intrinsically compact, durable, and potentially mass-producable: that make them easier than non-diode lasers to integrate into systems. Unfortunately, standard diode laser technology is not easily extendable to wavelengths longer than 3μm due to an unfavorable electronic band structure and increased non-radiative recombinations. Until recently, lead-salt lasers were the only commercially-viable diode lasers for this spectral region based on interband recombination. These lasers operated only at cryogenic operating temperatures around 80K and produced only low output powers of about 1mW.
Many groups attempted to develop alternative heterostructures that bypass some of the intrinsic inefficiencies of low-bandgap semiconductors. Most applications for mid-IR lasers need a device that can emit a continuous wave (CW) at or near room temperature with output powers higher than 100mW. Research groups followed several different paths including the use of Type II heterostructures (in which optical gain occurs due to interband transitions) and quantum cascade heterostructures (in which optical gain occurs due to intersubband transitions). The main difference between a quantum cascade laser (QCL) and traditional interband lasers is that, for a QCL, the emission wavelength is determined primarily bythe thickness of layers within the device. For an interband laser, the emission wavelength is determined by the natural bandgap of the constituent semiconductors (see Figure 1.)
Figure 1. Schematic difference between interband (left) and intersubband (right) emission in semiconductor quantum wells. The shortest emission wavelength of an intersubband laser is limited by the depth of the quantum well (in other words, the conduction band offset.)
While both approaches can create lasers in the 3 to 4μm wavelength range, no Type II structure has yet achieved CW operation at room temperature. Further, the potential for room-temperature operation at wavelengths longer than 4μm is even more limited, with consistently lower performance compared to intersubband techniques.
The idea of fabricating an infrared laser based on intersubband transitions within semiconductor quantum wells was first proposed by Kazarinov and Suris in 1971.4 The quantum cascade laser (QCL) is a variant of this approach, and was first demonstrated at Bell Laboratories in 1994.5
Because the QCL's wavelength depends on structure, rather than the semiconductor, it can have a very wide wavelength range as the emission energy approaches zero. Quantum-cascade-type terahertz lasers have already been demonstrated at wavelengths as long as 159μm at cryogenic temperatures.6 The main material limitation occurs at shorter wavelengths, at which point the emission energy is limited by the intrinsic energy depth; in other words, by the conduction band offset) of the quantum-well heterostructure.
Unfortunately, lattice-matched InP-based materials, which are the most extensively developed for the QCL, have a limited offset of about 510meV. We have increased this band offset using strain-balanced InP-based heterostructures. In this system, the quantum wells are compressively strained and the quantum barriers are tensilely strained. This allows for a much larger change in bandgap and conduction band offset at each interface than is possible in unstrained systems. We engineered the net strain in the device to be zero, which allows us to grow thick structures without significant strain-induced material defects. In general, this system is predicted to be able to demonstrate an offset of up to about 1eV, which should allow for emission down to wavelengths of roughly 3μm.
Our group demonstrated high-power CW operation throughout the 4.0 to 9.5μm wavelength range.7–9 Individual, room temperature, CW devices have produced output powers as high as 640mW with wavelengths near 6μm. Another recent result includes more than 100mW CW output power at wavelengths as short as 4μm (see Figure 2). The shortest wavelength demonstrated by a strain-balanced laser at room temperature is 3.66μm.10 Although this laser doesn't operate in CW mode at present, recent work allowed demonstration of average powers near 160mW at this wavelength, with peak powers near 1W.
Figure 2. Continuous wave performance of 4μm laser at room temperature. Inset shows continuous wave emission spectrum near threshold. b) Average power as a function of duty cycle for a pulsed 3.66μm quantum cascade laser at room temperature. Inset shows emission spectrum near threshold.
In addition, this technology is compatible with many of the advanced fabrication technologies used to make InP-based telecommunication lasers. Buried heterostructure strain-balanced QCLs have been demonstrated, which allow for a significant enhancement of laser performance.11 Further, distributed feedback (DFB) gratings allow for selective filtering of the output wavelength. While some power decrease is inevitable when using DFBs, we still observed more than 100 mW of continuous output at room temperature from a 4.8μm laser operating in a single spatial and spectral mode.12 Lastly, we improved the performance of our lasers by applying packaging techniques (used for high-power pump laser diodes at wavelengths of 808nm and 980nm) such as epilayer-down die bonding and the use of heat spreaders.
In conclusion, by leveraging the well-understood InP material systemwith an intersubband emission scheme, we created room-temperature diode lasers that emit at relatively high powers in the mid-infrared spectral region. At present, it is still difficultto access wavelengths shorter than 4μm but, as we continue to optimizematerial quality and laser design, we hope to achieve high power.output at wavelengths as low as 3μ in the future. This would bridge the gap between existing interband and.intersubband technology, and allow for seamless integration of.potentially inexpensive laser diode technology throughout the visible and infrared spectral regions.
Manijeh Razeghi, Steve Slivken, Allan Evans, Jean Nguyen, Yanbo Bai, Jae S. Yu , Shaban R. Darvish, Kan Mi
Center for Quantum Devices Northwestern University
Evanston, IL, USA
1. A.A Kostere, Y. A Bakhirkin, F.K Tittel, Ultrasensitive gas detection by quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy in the fundamental molecular absorption bands region,
Appl. Phys. B- Lasers and Optics,
Vol: 80, no. 1, pp. 133-138, 2005.
2. P. J Klass, Laircm designed to protect large transports against missiles,
Aviation Week & Space Technology,
Vol: 155, no. 18, pp. 76-, 2001.
3. S. Blaser, D. Hofstetter, M. Beck, J. Faist, Free-space optical data link using Peltier-cooled quantum cascade laser,
J Elect. Lett.,
Vol: 37, no. 12, pp. 1049-el:20010504, 1997.
4. R. F. Kazarinov, R. A Suris, Possibility of the amplification of electromagnetic waves in a semiconductor with a superlattice,
Soviet Phys. Semiconductors,
Vol: 5, pp. 707, 1971.
5. J. Faist, F. Capasso, D. L. Sivco, A. L. Hutchinson, A. Y. Cho, Quantum cascade laser,
Vol: 264, pp. 553-556, 1994.
6. G. Scalari, S. Blaser, J. Faist, H. Beere, E. Linfield, D. Ritchie, G. Davies, Terahertz emission from quantum cascade lasers in the quantum Hall regime: Evidence for many body resonances and localization effects,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 art. 237403,
7. W. W. Bewley, J. R. Lindle, C. S. Kim, I. Vurgaftman, J. R. Meyer, A. J. Evans, J. S. Yu, S. Slivken, M. Razeghi, Beam Steering in High-Power CW Quantum-Cascade Lasers,
IEEE J. of Quantum Electronics,
Vol: 41, no. 6, 2005.
8. Evans, J. S. Yu, S. Slivken, M. Razeghi, Continuous-wave operation of λ ∼ 4.8μm quantum-cascade lasers at room temperature,
Appl. Phys. Lett,
Vol: 85, no. 12, pp. 2166-2168, 2004.
9. J. S Yu, A. Evans, S. Slivken, S. R. Darvish, M. Razeghi, Short Wavelength (λ ∼ 4.3 μm) High-Performance Continuous-Wave Quantum-Cascade Lasers,
IEEE Photon. Tech. Lett,
Vol: 17, no. 6, pp. 1154, 2005.
10. M. Razeghi, A. J. Evans, S. Slivken, J. S. Yu, High Power CW Quantum Cascade Lasers: how short can we go?,
Proceedings of SPIE 5738,
pp. 1-12, 2005.
11. A. Evans, J. S. Yu, J. David, L. Doris, K. Mi, S. Slivken, M. Razeghi, High-temperature high-power continuous-wave operation of buried heterostructure quantum-cascade lasers,
Appl. Phys. Lett,
Vol: 84, no. 3, pp. 314-316, 2004.
12. J. S. Yu, S. Slivken, S. R. Darvish, A. Evans, B. Gokden, M. Razeghi, High-power, room-temperature and continuous-wave operation of distributed-feedback quantum-cascade lasers at λ,
Appl. Phys. Lett,
Vol: 87, no. 4, article 041104, 2005.
13. S. Slivken, A. Evans, J. David, M. Razeghi, High-Average-Power, High-Duty-Cycle (λ ∼ 6μm) Quantum Cascade Lasers,
Appl. Phys. Lett,
Vol: 81, no. 23, pp. 4321-4323, 2002.