Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparison Of Digital Workstations And Conventional Reading For Evaluation Of User Interfaces In Digital Radiology
Author(s): Kevin M. McNeill; George W. Seeley; Kris Maloney; Laurie Fajardo; Mark Kozik
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The User Interface Study Group at the University of Arizona is investigating the interaction of Radiologists with digital workstations. Using the Arizona Viewing Console we have conducted an experiment to compare a digital workstation with a particular conventional reading process used for cases from a local Health Maintenance Organization. A model consisting of three distinct phases of activity was developed to describe conventional reading process. From this model software was developed for the Arizona Viewing Console to approximate the process. Radiologists were then video taped reading similar sets of cases at each workstation and the tapes were analyzed for frequency of hand movements and time required for each phase of the process. This study provides a comparison between conventional reading and a digital workstation. This paper describes the reading process, the model and its approximation on the digital workstation, as well as the analysis of the video tapes.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 June 1988
PDF: 5 pages
Proc. SPIE 0914, Medical Imaging II, (27 June 1988); doi: 10.1117/12.968724
Show Author Affiliations
Kevin M. McNeill, The University of Arizona (United States)
George W. Seeley, The University of Arizona (United States)
Kris Maloney, The University of Arizona (United States)
Laurie Fajardo, The University of Arizona (United States)
Mark Kozik, The University of Arizona (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0914:
Medical Imaging II
Samuel J. Dwyer; Roger H. Schneider; Samuel J. Dwyer; Roger H. Schneider; Roger H. Schneider; Samuel J. Dwyer, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top