Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Retroreflector Concepts; Corner-Cube Compared To Catseye
Author(s): Joseph B.C. Fuller, Jr.
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

A discussion of field-of-view (F.O.V.) and expected wavefront errors for the standard solid and open cube-corner retroreflector (C.C.R.) is compared with a catseye retroreflector (C.E.R.). The asymmetry of the C.C.R. F.O.V. will be compared to the completely symmetrical F.O.V. for a C.E.R. Ray trace spot diagrams for a catseye design will be presented that show the interaction on requirements for (clear aperture)-(wavefront quality)-(field of view). A discussion of retroreflector design considerations will show that a catseye retroreflector design performs well at large field-of-view angles where a basic C.C.R. has no performance. The thermal considerations, when using a C.C.R. in an outdoor environment, would add to the design complexity for mounting the elements of a hollow or open C.C.R. The catseye retroreflector, while having tight manufacturing tolerances, would be relatively free of mounting design complexity. The simpler mounting design requirements are obtained from a less critical alignment requirement for the assembled C.E.R. The polarization effects that a C.C.R. would introduce into a return beam would be totally eliminated by a C.E.R.

Paper Details

Date Published: 1 January 1987
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 0818, Current Developments in Optical Engineering II, (1 January 1987); doi: 10.1117/12.967454
Show Author Affiliations
Joseph B.C. Fuller, Jr., Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0818:
Current Developments in Optical Engineering II
Robert E. Fischer; Warren J. Smith, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top