Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Depth imaging at kilometer range using time-correlated single-photon counting at wavelengths of 850 nm and 1560 nm
Author(s): Gerald S. Buller; Aongus McCarthy; Ximing Ren; Nathan R. Gemmell; Robert J. Collins; Nils J. Krichel; Michael G. Tanner; Andrew M. Wallace; Sandor Dorenbos; Val Zwiller; Robert H. Hadfield
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Active depth imaging approaches are being used in a number of emerging applications, for example in environmental sensing, manufacturing and defense. The high sensitivity and picosecond timing resolution of the time-correlated single-photon counting technique can provide distinct advantages in the trade-offs between required illumination power, range, depth resolution and data acquisition durations. These considerations must also address requirements for eye-safety, especially in applications requiring outdoor, kilometer range sensing. We present a scanning time-of-flight imager based on MHz repetition-rate pulsed illumination operating with sub-milliwatt average power. The use of a scanning mechanism permits operation with an individual, high-performance single-photon detector. The system has been used with a number of non-cooperative targets, in different weather conditions and various ambient light conditions. We consider a number of system issues, including the range ambiguity issue and scattering from multiple surfaces. The initial work was performed at wavelengths around 850 nm for convenient use with Si-based single photon avalanche diode detectors, however we will also discuss the performance at a wavelength of 1560 nm, made using superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. The use of the latter wavelength band allows access to a low-loss atmospheric window, as well as greatly reduced solar background contribution and less stringent eye safety considerations. We consider a range of optical design configurations and discuss the performance trade-offs and future directions in more detail.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 October 2012
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 8460, Biosensing and Nanomedicine V, 84601I (10 October 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.965890
Show Author Affiliations
Gerald S. Buller, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Aongus McCarthy, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Ximing Ren, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Nathan R. Gemmell, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Robert J. Collins, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Nils J. Krichel, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Michael G. Tanner, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Andrew M. Wallace, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)
Sandor Dorenbos, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft Unit. of Technology (Netherlands)
Val Zwiller, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft Univ. of Technology (Netherlands)
Robert H. Hadfield, Heriot-Watt Univ. (United Kingdom)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8460:
Biosensing and Nanomedicine V
Hooman Mohseni; Massoud H. Agahi; Manijeh Razeghi, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top