Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Economic Analysis Of A Quality Control Program
Author(s): C. L. Hall
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Our experience with Quality Control Programs in many x-ray departments shows that the reject rate can frequently be reduced about 45% through proper controls. A Reject Analysis establishes the current reject rate and its associated film cost. Based on the reject analysis, appropriate corrective programs are undertaken. Typical corrective programs are processor monitoring and maintenance, screen/cassette program, inventory control and technique consultation. Six months to one year after the Reject Analysis, a follow-up Reject Analysis measures the effect of the Quality Control Program. Data compiled from many x-ray departments indicate an average reject rate of 13%. The chest exam usually accounts for the most repeats. Incorrect density and poor positioning are the major reasons for repeated exams. The Quality Control Program usually reduces the reject rate to about 7%, a 45% reduction. If the annual film cost is $150,000, the savings from this reduction can be as much as $9,000 in film alone. Other costs such as chemicals and equipment are also reduced.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 December 1977
PDF: 5 pages
Proc. SPIE 0127, Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VI, (27 December 1977); doi: 10.1117/12.955949
Show Author Affiliations
C. L. Hall, E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0127:
Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine VI
Joel E. Gray; William R. Hendee, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top