Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Optical Performance And Process Characterizations Of Several High Contrast Metal-Ion-Free Developer Processes
Author(s): John S. Petersen; Alan E. Kozlowski
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Projection print quality is dependent upon the response of the resist/developer system to the optically projected image. For this reason, it is critical, during process optimization, to relate final pattern quality to both the chemical and physical contrast terms. One method for doing this is to monitor resist/developer response in the absence and then the presence of diffracted light. These results are then compared to the predicted optical requirements. For best performance, the resist/developer (or chemical) contrast must ex-ceed that of the potential optical (or physical) contrast. To do rapid contrast compari-sons it is convenient to relate the chemical contrast term,r, to the physical contrast term MTF, via the CMTF1: where the CMTF = (1014- 1)/(lol* 1) = (Ethreshold Einitial)/ (Ethreshold Einitial) and the MTF=(Emax Emin)/(Emax + EmiA. Perfect imaging potential occurs chemically when the CMTF = 0, Einitial r-- Ethreshold, and physically when the MTF = 1.0, Emin = 0. As a result, acceptable patterning occurs when the MTF/CMTF ratio is greater than one. This ratio is a comparative, accept/reject test only; final nrocess optimization is done by monitoring the accepted resist/developer systems' performance on projected images. Optimum process latitude is predicted by determining focal tolerances at various mask sizing biases and by measuring linewidth necking over steps. This study demonstrates the dependence of the final print quality on the chemical con-trast. A method is examined for approximating minimum allowable chemical contrast required for adequately printing desired device design sizes. Then chemical contrast results for various metal-ion-free develop processes are shown. Next, the combined resist/developer/ optical performance is optimized by using focal tolerance and linewidth control over steps as process constraints. Finally, it is shown that focal tolerances are dependent on chemical contrast and that the focus budget is tunable.

Paper Details

Date Published: 21 May 1984
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 0469, Advances in Resist Technology I, (21 May 1984); doi: 10.1117/12.941776
Show Author Affiliations
John S. Petersen, Shipley Company (United States)
Alan E. Kozlowski, Shipley Company (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 0469:
Advances in Resist Technology I
C. Grant Willson, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top