Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Complexities of complex contrast
Author(s): Andrew M. Haun; Eli Peli
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

For the visual system, luminance contrast is a fundamental property of images, and is one of the main inputs of any simulation of visual processing. Many models intended to evaluate visual properties such as image discriminability compute perceived contrast by using contrast sensitivity functions derived from studies of human spatial vision. Such use is of questionable validity even for such applications (i.e. full-reference image quality metrics), but it is usually inappropriate for no-reference image quality measures. In this paper, we outline why the contrast sensitivity functions commonly used are not appropriate in such applications, and why weighting suprathreshold contrasts by any sensitivity function can be misleading. We propose that rather than weighting image contrasts (or contrast differences) by some assumed sensitivity function, it would be more useful for most purposes requiring estimates of perceived contrast or quality to develop an estimate of efficiency: how much of an image is making it past the relevant thresholds.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 January 2012
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 8292, Color Imaging XVII: Displaying, Processing, Hardcopy, and Applications, 82920E (24 January 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.915365
Show Author Affiliations
Andrew M. Haun, Schepens Eye Research Institute (United States)
Eli Peli, Schepens Eye Research Institute (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8292:
Color Imaging XVII: Displaying, Processing, Hardcopy, and Applications
Reiner Eschbach; Gabriel G. Marcu; Alessandro Rizzi, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top