Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Visual grading regression with random effects
Author(s): Örjan Smedby; Mats Fredrikson; Jakob De Geer; Michael Sandborg
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

To analyze visual grading experiments, ordinal logistic regression (here called visual grading regression, VGR) may be used in the statistical analysis. In addition to types of imaging or post-processing, the VGR model may include factors such as patient and observer identity, which should be treated as random effects. Standard software does not allow random factors in ordinal logistic regression, but using Generalized Linear Latent And Mixed Models (GLLAMM) this is possible. In a single-image study, 9 radiologists graded 24 cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) images with reduced dose without and after post-processing with a 2D adaptive filter, using five image quality criteria. First, standard ordinal logistic regression was carried out, treating filtering, patient and observer identity as fixed effects. The same analysis was then repeated with GLLAMM, treating filtering as a fixed effect and patient and observer identity as random effects. With both approaches, a significant effect (p<0.01) of the filtering was found for all five criteria. No dramatic differences in parameter estimates or significance levels were found between the two approaches. It is concluded that random effects can be appropriately handled in VGR using GLLAMM, but no major differences in the results were found in a preliminary evaluation.

Paper Details

Date Published: 22 February 2012
PDF: 5 pages
Proc. SPIE 8318, Medical Imaging 2012: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 831805 (22 February 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.913650
Show Author Affiliations
Örjan Smedby, Linköping Univ. (Sweden)
Mats Fredrikson, Linköping Univ. (Sweden)
Jakob De Geer, Linköping Univ. (Sweden)
Michael Sandborg, Linköping Univ. (Sweden)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8318:
Medical Imaging 2012: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Craig K. Abbey; Claudia R. Mello-Thoms, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top