Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Gleason grading of prostate histology utilizing manifold regularization via statistical shape model of manifolds
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Gleason patterns of prostate cancer histopathology, characterized primarily by morphological and architectural attributes of histological structures (glands and nuclei), have been found to be highly correlated with disease aggressiveness and patient outcome. Gleason patterns 4 and 5 are highly correlated with more aggressive disease and poorer patient outcome, while Gleason patterns 1-3 tend to reflect more favorable patient outcome. Because Gleason grading is done manually by a pathologist visually examining glass (or digital) slides, subtle morphologic and architectural differences of histological attributes may result in grading errors and hence cause high inter-observer variability. Recently some researchers have proposed computerized decision support systems to automatically grade Gleason patterns by using features pertaining to nuclear architecture, gland morphology, as well as tissue texture. Automated characterization of gland morphology has been shown to distinguish between intermediate Gleason patterns 3 and 4 with high accuracy. Manifold learning (ML) schemes attempt to generate a low dimensional manifold representation of a higher dimensional feature space while simultaneously preserving nonlinear relationships between object instances. Classification can then be performed in the low dimensional space with high accuracy. However ML is sensitive to the samples contained in the dataset; changes in the dataset may alter the manifold structure. In this paper we present a manifold regularization technique to constrain the low dimensional manifold to a specific range of possible manifold shapes, the range being determined via a statistical shape model of manifolds (SSMM). In this work we demonstrate applications of the SSMM in (1) identifying samples on the manifold which contain noise, defined as those samples which deviate from the SSMM, and (2) accurate out-of-sample extrapolation (OSE) of newly acquired samples onto a manifold constrained by the SSMM. We demonstrate these applications of the SSMM in the context of distinguishing between Gleason patterns 3 and 4 using glandular morphologic features in a prostate histopathology dataset of 58 patient studies. Identifying and eliminating noisy samples from the manifold via the SSMM results in a statistically significant improvement in classification accuracy (CA), 93.0 ± 1.0% with removal of noisy samples compared to a CA of 90.9 ± 1.1% without removal of samples. The use of the SSMM for OSE of new independent test instances also shows statistically significant improvement in CA, 87.1±0.8% with the SSMM compared to 85.6±0.1% without the SSMM. Similar improvements were observed for the synthetic Swiss Roll and Helix datasets.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 February 2012
PDF: 13 pages
Proc. SPIE 8315, Medical Imaging 2012: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 83151J (23 February 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.912887
Show Author Affiliations
Rachel Sparks, Rutgers, The State Univ. of New Jersey (United States)
Anant Madabhushi, Rutgers, The State Univ. of New Jersey (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8315:
Medical Imaging 2012: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Bram van Ginneken; Carol L. Novak, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top