Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Interactive content-based image retrieval (CBIR) computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system for ultrasound breast masses using relevance feedback
Author(s): Hyun-chong Cho; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Mark Helvie; Alexis V. Nees
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

We designed a Content-Based Image Retrieval (CBIR) Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CADx) system to assist radiologists in characterizing masses on ultrasound images. The CADx system retrieves masses that are similar to a query mass from a reference library based on computer-extracted features that describe texture, width-to-height ratio, and posterior shadowing of a mass. Retrieval is performed with k nearest neighbor (k-NN) method using Euclidean distance similarity measure and Rocchio relevance feedback algorithm (RRF). In this study, we evaluated the similarity between the query and the retrieved masses with relevance feedback using our interactive CBIR CADx system. The similarity assessment and feedback were provided by experienced radiologists' visual judgment. For training the RRF parameters, similarities of 1891 image pairs obtained from 62 masses were rated by 3 MQSA radiologists using a 9-point scale (9=most similar). A leave-one-out method was used in training. For each query mass, 5 most similar masses were retrieved from the reference library using radiologists' similarity ratings, which were then used by RRF to retrieve another 5 masses for the same query. The best RRF parameters were chosen based on three simulated observer experiments, each of which used one of the radiologists' ratings for retrieval and relevance feedback. For testing, 100 independent query masses on 100 images and 121 reference masses on 230 images were collected. Three radiologists rated the similarity between the query and the computer-retrieved masses. Average similarity ratings without and with RRF were 5.39 and 5.64 on the training set and 5.78 and 6.02 on the test set, respectively. The average Az values without and with RRF were 0.86±0.03 and 0.87±0.03 on the training set and 0.91±0.03 and 0.90±0.03 on the test set, respectively. This study demonstrated that RRF improved the similarity of the retrieved masses.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 February 2012
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 8315, Medical Imaging 2012: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 831509 (23 February 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.912164
Show Author Affiliations
Hyun-chong Cho, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Lubomir Hadjiiski, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Berkman Sahiner, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Heang-Ping Chan, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Chintana Paramagul, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Mark Helvie, Univ. of Michigan (United States)
Alexis V. Nees, Univ. of Michigan (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8315:
Medical Imaging 2012: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Bram van Ginneken; Carol L. Novak, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top