Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of quality of experience in interactive 3D visualization: methodology and results
Author(s): Sylvain Tourancheau; Mårten Sjöström; Roger Olsson; Anders Persson; Thomas Ericson
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Human factors are of high importance in 3D visualization, but subjective evaluation of 3D displays is not easy because of a high variability among users. This study aimed to evaluate and compare two different 3D visualization systems (a market stereoscopic display, and a state-of-the-art multi-view display) in terms of user performance and quality of experience (QoE), in the context of interactive visualization. An adapted methodology has been designed in order to focus on 3D differences and to reduce the influence of all other factors. Thirty-six subjects took part in an experiment during which they were asked to judge the quality of their experience, according to specific features. Results showed that a scene understanding and precision was significantly better on the multi-view display. Concerning the quality of experience, visual comfort was judged significantly better on the multi-view display and visual fatigue was reported by 52% of the subjects on the stereoscopic display. This study has permitted to identify some factors influencing QoE such as prior experience and stereopsis threshold.

Paper Details

Date Published: 22 February 2012
PDF: 14 pages
Proc. SPIE 8288, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIII, 82880O (22 February 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.907962
Show Author Affiliations
Sylvain Tourancheau, Mid Sweden Univ. (Sweden)
Mårten Sjöström, Mid Sweden Univ. (Sweden)
Roger Olsson, Mid Sweden Univ. (Sweden)
Anders Persson, Linköping Univ. Hospital (Sweden)
Thomas Ericson, Setred AB (Sweden)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8288:
Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIII
Andrew J. Woods; Nicolas S. Holliman; Gregg E. Favalora, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top