Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Optical characterization of the Utah slant optrode array for intrafascicular infrared neural stimulation
Author(s): T. V. F. Abaya; M. Diwekar; S. Blair; P. Tathireddy; L. Rieth; G. A. Clark; F. Solzbacher
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

We present an early-generation Utah Slant Optrode Array (USOA) for infrared (IR) neural stimulation. Intrafascicular IR stimulation with the early prototype in the cat sciatic nerve produced highly selective and artifact-free responses, which outperformed extraneural IR stimulation. We characterized the light delivery and loss mechanisms of the device in order to facilitate design optimization. Fabrication of the USOA takes advantage of the extensive research in the development of the Utah Slant Electrode Array (USEA). An undoped (ρ > 20 ω ρ cm) c-Si (100) substrate was used to produce a 10 x 10 array of optrodes with lengths from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm in a 400-μm pitch. This substrate is able to transmit IR (λ > 1.1μm) with negligible absorption losses. The optrodes were coupled to the laser source via fibers of different core diameters through in-coupling interfaces of varying refractive indices. The effect of these factors on optrode transmission efficiency was investigated. At 1550nm, transmittance for a butt-coupled 50-μm multimode fiber through a medium of index n = 1.66 was measured as 34.7%, which was the maximum value obtained. When the refractive index of the intervening medium was lowered, transmission decreased according to Fresnel reflection theory. Above 100-μm core size, transmitted power decreases by 40% with each doubling of the fiber core diameter. Transmission was also found to be dependent on the optrode length, where shorter and more tapered optrodes provided less output power. The results suggest that Fresnel, coupling, and radiation losses are the primary loss mechanisms.

Paper Details

Date Published: 9 February 2012
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 8207, Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics VIII, 82075M (9 February 2012); doi: 10.1117/12.907375
Show Author Affiliations
T. V. F. Abaya, The Univ. of Utah (United States)
M. Diwekar, The Univ. of Utah (United States)
S. Blair, The Univ. of Utah (United States)
P. Tathireddy, The Univ. of Utah (United States)
L. Rieth, The Univ. of Utah (United States)
G. A. Clark, The Univ. of Utah (United States)
F. Solzbacher, The Univ. of Utah (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8207:
Photonic Therapeutics and Diagnostics VIII
Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Andreas Mandelis; Kenton W. Gregory M.D.; Nikiforos Kollias; Hyun Wook Kang; Henry Hirschberg M.D.; Melissa J. Suter; Brian Jet-Fei Wong M.D.; Justus F. Ilgner M.D.; Stephen Lam; Bodo E. Knudsen M.D.; Steen Madsen; E. Duco Jansen; Bernard Choi; Guillermo J. Tearney M.D.; Laura Marcu; Haishan Zeng; Matthew Brenner; Krzysztof Izdebski, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top