Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Challenges associated with advanced mask cleaning
Author(s): Brian J. Grenon
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Historically, photomask and wafer cleaning have been considered trivial tasks. The primary challenge had been simply the removal of particles that may have an impact on final product yield. As wavelengths decrease and energy on the image plane of the reticle increase, the degree and complexity of surface contaminants on the reticle become a more complicated challenge. The result is that the mask fabricator is faced with two new challenges; reducing and identifying the types of contaminants on the reticle prior to exposure in the wafer fab and eliminating contaminants that have been deposited in the fab. These contaminants are often different in that 193nm exposure produces higher molecular weight contaminants that can be more difficult to remove. While the effects of these contaminants may not be serious for transmissive lithography, their effects can be catastrophic for reflective lithography, such as Extreme Ultra- Violet (EUV) lithography. We will provide results showing the types of contaminants commonly found on various types of reticles and the respective challenges associated with their removal. Additionally, prior to developing an effective cleaning protocol understanding the chemical composition of the substrate is extremely important. We will provide analytical data that will clearly describe the composition of the mask substrates.

Paper Details

Date Published: 13 October 2011
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 8166, Photomask Technology 2011, 81661K (13 October 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.899055
Show Author Affiliations
Brian J. Grenon, Grenon Consulting, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 8166:
Photomask Technology 2011
Wilhelm Maurer; Frank E. Abboud, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top