Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Improved overlay control using robust outlier removal methods
Author(s): John C. Robinson; Osamu Fujita; Hiroyuki Kurita; Pavel Izikson; Dana Klein; Inna Tarshish-Shapir
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Overlay control is one of the most critical areas in advanced semiconductor processing. Maintaining optimal product disposition and control requires high quality data as an input. Outliers can contaminate lot statistics and negatively impact lot disposition and feedback control. Advanced outlier removal methods have been developed to minimize their impact on overlay data processing. Rejection methods in use today are generally based on metrology quality metrics, raw data statistics and/or residual data statistics. Shortcomings of typical methods include the inability to detect multiple outliers as well as the unnecessary rejection of valid data. As the semiconductor industry adopts high-order overlay modeling techniques, outlier rejection becomes more important than for linear modeling. In this paper we discuss the use of robust regression methods in order to more accurately eliminate outliers. We show the results of an extensive simulation study, as well as a case study with data from a semiconductor manufacturer.

Paper Details

Date Published: 20 April 2011
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 7971, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV, 79711G (20 April 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.879494
Show Author Affiliations
John C. Robinson, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Osamu Fujita, KLA-Tencor Corp. Japan (Japan)
Hiroyuki Kurita, KLA-Tencor Corp. Japan (Japan)
Pavel Izikson, KLA-Tencor Corp. Isreal (Israel)
Dana Klein, KLA-Tencor Corp. Isreal (Israel)
Inna Tarshish-Shapir, KLA-Tencor Corp. Isreal (Israel)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7971:
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV
Christopher J. Raymond, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top