Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Optimization of e-beam landing energy for EBDW
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

As critical dimensions in Logic chips continue to shrink, EBDW (E-Beam Direct Write) will play a growing role. EBDW is capable of patterning 2D shapes at extremely high resolution. EBDW will pattern low-density critical wafer-layers, complementing optical lithography in high volume manufacturing. E-beam landing energies ranging from 5 keV to 100 keV are used in EBDW today. The choice of e-beam energy effects resolution, throughput and overlay errors due to thermal effects. We present an analysis of the tradeoffs of various e-beam landing energies. We examine 5 keV, 7.5 keV, 10 keV, 20 keV and 50 keV. We use a simple column design and SIMION 8 simulation software. SIMION 8 (from Scientific Instrument Services, Inc.) is used for electrostatic lens analysis and charged particle trajectory modeling We examine: 1. Resolution (beam dose profile in resist) 2. Overlay errors due to thermal effects (beam power) Low energy EBDW has advantages in resist sensitivity and thermal control. Its disadvantages include lower beam current and a requirement for very thin resist. High energy EBDW has advantages in beam current and resolution. Its disadvantages include wafer heating and low resist sensitivity. With set requirements for resolution and thermal expansion, we report findings of beam profile and beam dose at various beam energies.

Paper Details

Date Published: 4 April 2011
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 7970, Alternative Lithographic Technologies III, 79701S (4 April 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.879443
Show Author Affiliations
Enden D. Liu, Multibeam Corp. (United States)
Ted Prescop, Multibeam Corp. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7970:
Alternative Lithographic Technologies III
Daniel J. C. Herr, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top