Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Preliminary comparison between real-time in-vivo spectral and transverse oscillation velocity estimates
Author(s): Mads Møller Pedersen; Michael Johannes Pihl; Per Haugaard; Jens Munk Hansen; Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Jørgen Arendt Jensen
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Spectral velocity estimation is considered the gold standard in medical ultrasound. Peak systole (PS), end diastole (ED), and resistive index (RI) are used clinically. Angle correction is performed using a flow angle set manually. With Transverse Oscillation (TO) velocity estimates the flow angle, peak systole (PSTO), end diastole (EDTO), and resistive index (RITO) are estimated. This study investigates if these clinical parameters are estimated equally good using spectral and TO data. The right common carotid arteries of three healthy volunteers were scanned longitudinally. Average TO flow angles and std were calculated { 52±18 ; 55±23 ; 60±16 }°. Spectral angles { 52 ; 56 ; 52 }° were obtained from the B-mode images. Obtained values are: PSTO { 76±15 ; 89±28 ; 77±7 } cm/s, spectral PS { 77 ; 110 ; 76 } cm/s, EDTO { 10±3 ; 14±8 ; 15±3 } cm/s, spectral ED { 18 ; 13 ; 20 } cm/s, RITO { 0.87±0.05 ; 0.79±0.21 ; 0.79±0.06 }, and spectral RI { 0.77 ; 0.88 ; 0.73 }. Vector angles are within ±two std of the spectral angle. TO velocity estimates are within ±three std of the spectral estimates. RITO are within ±two std of the spectral estimates. Preliminary data indicates that the TO and spectral velocity estimates are equally good. With TO there is no manual angle setting and no flow angle limitation. TO velocity estimation can also automatically handle situations where the angle varies over the cardiac cycle. More detailed temporal and spatial vector estimates with diagnostic potential are available with the TO velocity estimation.

Paper Details

Date Published: 25 March 2011
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 7968, Medical Imaging 2011: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy, 79680K (25 March 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.877221
Show Author Affiliations
Mads Møller Pedersen, Rigshospitalet (Denmark)
Michael Johannes Pihl, Technical Univ. of Denmark (Denmark)
Per Haugaard, B-K Medical A/S (Denmark)
Jens Munk Hansen, Technical Univ. of Denmark (Denmark)
Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen, Rigshospitalet (Denmark)
Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Rigshospitalet (Denmark)
Jørgen Arendt Jensen, Technical Univ. of Denmark (Denmark)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7968:
Medical Imaging 2011: Ultrasonic Imaging, Tomography, and Therapy
Jan D'hooge; Marvin M. Doyley, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top