Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Process window and integration results for full-chip model-based assist-feature placement at the 32 nm node and below
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Model-based assist-feature (MBAF) placement has been shown to have considerable lithographic benefits vs. rule-based assist-feature (RBAF) placement for advanced technology-node requirements. For very strong off-axis illumination, MBAF-placement methods offer improved process window, especially for so-called forbidden pitch regions, and greatly simplified tuning of AF-placement parameters. Historically, however, MBAF-placement methods had difficulties with full-chip runtime, friendliness to mask manufacturing (e.g., mask rule checks or MRCs), and methods to ensure that placed AFs do not print on-wafer. Therefore, despite their known limitations, RBAF-placement methods were still the industry de facto solution through the 45 nm technology node. In this paper, we highlight recent manufacturability advances for MBAFs by a detailed comparison of MBAF and RBAF methods. The MBAF method employed uses Inverse Mask Technology (IMT) to optimize AF placement, size, shape, and software runtime, to meet the production requirements of the 28 nm technology node and below. MBAF vs. RBAF results are presented for process window performance, and MBAF vs. OPC results are presented for full-chip runtimes. The final results show that MBAF methods have process-window advantages for technology nodes below 45 nm, with runtimes that are comparable to OPC.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 March 2010
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 7640, Optical Microlithography XXIII, 76401W (10 March 2010); doi: 10.1117/12.848443
Show Author Affiliations
Ji Li, Synopsys, Inc. (China)
Gerard Luk-Pat, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Amyn Poonawala, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Kevin Lucas, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)
Ben Painter, Synopsys, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7640:
Optical Microlithography XXIII
Mircea V. Dusa; Will Conley, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top