Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Simulation based mask defect repair verification and disposition
Author(s): Eric Guo; Shirley Zhao; Skin Zhang; Sandy Qian; Guojie Cheng; Abhishek Vikram; Ling Li; Ye Chen; Chingyun Hsiang; Gary Zhang; Bo Su
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

As the industry moves towards sub-65nm technology nodes, the mask inspection, with increased sensitivity and shrinking critical defect size, catches more and more nuisance and false defects. Increased defect counts pose great challenges in the post inspection defect classification and disposition: which defect is real defect, and among the real defects, which defect should be repaired and how to verify the post-repair defects. In this paper, we address the challenges in mask defect verification and disposition, in particular, in post repair defect verification by an efficient methodology, using SEM mask defect images, and optical inspection mask defects images (only for verification of phase and transmission related defects). We will demonstrate the flow using programmed mask defects in sub-65nm technology node design. In total 20 types of defects were designed including defects found in typical real circuit environments with 30 different sizes designed for each type. The SEM image was taken for each programmed defect after the test mask was made. Selected defects were repaired and SEM images from the test mask were taken again. Wafers were printed with the test mask before and after repair as defect printability references. A software tool SMDD-Simulation based Mask Defect Disposition-has been used in this study. The software is used to extract edges from the mask SEM images and convert them into polygons to save in GDSII format. Then, the converted polygons from the SEM images were filled with the correct tone to form mask patterns and were merged back into the original GDSII design file. This merge is for the purpose of contour simulation-since normally the SEM images cover only small area (~1 μm) and accurate simulation requires including larger area of optical proximity effect. With lithography process model, the resist contour of area of interest (AOI-the area surrounding a mask defect) can be simulated. If such complicated model is not available, a simple optical model can be used to get simulated aerial image intensity in the AOI. With built-in contour analysis functions, the SMDD software can easily compare the contour (or intensity) differences between defect pattern and normal pattern. With user provided judging criteria, this software can be easily disposition the defect based on contour comparison. In addition, process sensitivity properties, like MEEF and NILS, can be readily obtained in the AOI with a lithography model, which will make mask defect disposition criteria more intelligent.

Paper Details

Date Published: 23 September 2009
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 7488, Photomask Technology 2009, 74880G (23 September 2009); doi: 10.1117/12.829692
Show Author Affiliations
Eric Guo, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (China)
Shirley Zhao, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (China)
Skin Zhang, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (China)
Sandy Qian, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (China)
Guojie Cheng, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (China)
Abhishek Vikram, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (China)
Ling Li, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (China)
Ye Chen, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (United States)
Chingyun Hsiang, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (United States)
Gary Zhang, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (China)
Bo Su, Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7488:
Photomask Technology 2009
Larry S. Zurbrick; M. Warren Montgomery, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top