Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Scanner-specific separable models for computational lithography
Author(s): Stefan Hunsche; Xu Xie; Qian Zhao; Hua-Yu Liu; Peter Nikolsky; Anthony Ngai
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The usage of conventional OPC models traditionally was confined to the specific process conditions at which the models were. Separable models for computational lithography (CL), including OPC and post-OPC layout verification, allow extrapolation of the calibrated model and accurate prediction at process conditions different from the exact settings used for model calibration. This capability enables significantly reduced turnaround time in early process development, and it opens the way for new applications such as model based process optimization. It relies on sufficiently accurate modeling of litho process components as separate subsystems, in particular mask, scanner optics, and resist process. Inclusion of actual machine parameters of the exposure tool in the optical model can improve model accuracy and predictability, while 'actual machine parameters' may represent either a specific scanner type or an individual exposure tool. We study the impact of machine parameters that can be incorporated in a modern computational litho model, by analyzing their relative effect on predicted CD measurements and extract a ranking in terms of their expected benefit for model separability. An experimental study demonstrates improved model accuracy and separability by inclusion of either scanner-type specific model data or individual machine-specific metrology data in the CL model building process.

Paper Details

Date Published: 17 October 2008
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 7122, Photomask Technology 2008, 71221V (17 October 2008); doi: 10.1117/12.801706
Show Author Affiliations
Stefan Hunsche, Brion Technologies (United States)
Xu Xie, Brion Technologies (United States)
Qian Zhao, Brion Technologies (United States)
Hua-Yu Liu, Brion Technologies (United States)
Peter Nikolsky, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)
Anthony Ngai, ASML Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7122:
Photomask Technology 2008
Hiroichi Kawahira; Larry S. Zurbrick, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top