Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

The discrete Radon transform: a more efficient approach to image reconstruction?
Author(s): Andrew Kingston; Imants Svalbe; Jean-Pierre Guédon
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The Radon transform and its inversion are the mathematical keys that enable tomography. Radon transforms are defined for continuous objects with continuous projections at all angles in [0,π). In practice, however, we pre-filter discrete projections taken at a discrete set of angles and reconstruct a discrete object. Since we are approximating a continuous transform, it would seem that acquiring more projections at finer projection resolutions is the path to providing better reconstructions. Alternatively, a discrete Radon transform (DRT) and its inversion can be implemented. Then the angle set and the projection resolution are discrete having been predefined by the required resolution of the tomogram. DRT projections are not necessarily evenly spaced in [0, π), but are concentrated in directions which require more information due to the discrete square [or cubic] grid of the reconstruction space. A DRT, by design, removes the need for interpolation, speeding up the reconstruction process and gives the minimum number of projections required, reducing the acquisition time and minimizing the required radiation dose. This paper reviews the concept of a DRT and demonstrates how they can be used to reconstruct objects from X-ray projections more efficiently in terms of the number of projections and to enable speedier reconstruction. This idea has been studied as early as 1977 by Myron Katz. The work begun by Katz has continued and many methods using different DRT versions have been proposed for tomographic image reconstruction. Here, results using several of the prominent DRT formalisms are included to demonstrate the different techniques involved. The quality and artifact structure of the reconstructed images are compared and contrasted with that obtained using standard filtered back projection.

Paper Details

Date Published: 15 September 2008
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 7078, Developments in X-Ray Tomography VI, 70780G (15 September 2008); doi: 10.1117/12.795779
Show Author Affiliations
Andrew Kingston, The Australian National Univ. (Australia)
Imants Svalbe, Monash Univ. (Australia)
Jean-Pierre Guédon, IRCCyN-IVC, École Polytech., l’Univ. de Nantes (France)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7078:
Developments in X-Ray Tomography VI
Stuart R. Stock, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top