Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparison of two algorithms in the automatic segmentation of blood vessels in fundus images
Author(s): Robert LeAnder; Myneni Sushma Chowdary; Swapnasri Mokkapati; Scott E. Umbaugh
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Effective timing and treatment are critical to saving the sight of patients with diabetes. Lack of screening, as well as a shortage of ophthalmologists, help contribute to approximately 8,000 cases per year of people who lose their sight to diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of new cases of blindness [1] [2]. Timely treatment for diabetic retinopathy prevents severe vision loss in over 50% of eyes tested [1]. Fundus images can provide information for detecting and monitoring eye-related diseases, like diabetic retinopathy, which if detected early, may help prevent vision loss. Damaged blood vessels can indicate the presence of diabetic retinopathy [9]. So, early detection of damaged vessels in retinal images can provide valuable information about the presence of disease, thereby helping to prevent vision loss. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two blood vessel segmentation algorithms. Methods: Fifteen fundus images from the STARE database were used to develop two algorithms using the CVIPtools software environment. Another set of fifteen images were derived from the first fifteen and contained ophthalmologists' hand-drawn tracings over the retinal vessels. The ophthalmologists' tracings were used as the "gold standard" for perfect segmentation and compared with the segmented images that were output by the two algorithms. Comparisons between the segmented and the hand-drawn images were made using Pratt's Figure of Merit (FOM), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Root Mean Square (RMS) Error. Results: Algorithm 2 has an FOM that is 10% higher than Algorithm 1. Algorithm 2 has a 6%-higher SNR than Algorithm 1. Algorithm 2 has only 1.3% more RMS error than Algorithm 1. Conclusions: Algorithm 1 extracted most of the blood vessels with some missing intersections and bifurcations. Algorithm 2 extracted all the major blood vessels, but eradicated some vessels as well. Algorithm 2 outperformed Algorithm 1 in terms of visual clarity, FOM and SNR. The performances of these algorithms show that they have an appreciable amount of potential in helping ophthalmologists detect the severity of eye-related diseases and prevent vision loss.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 March 2008
PDF: 16 pages
Proc. SPIE 6915, Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 69153H (27 March 2008); doi: 10.1117/12.770786
Show Author Affiliations
Robert LeAnder, Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville (United States)
Myneni Sushma Chowdary, Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville (United States)
Swapnasri Mokkapati, Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville (United States)
Scott E. Umbaugh, Southern Illinois Univ. Edwardsville (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6915:
Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Maryellen L. Giger; Nico Karssemeijer, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top