Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Impact of alternative mask stacks on the imaging performance at NA 1.20 and above
Author(s): Vicky Philipsen; Kei Mesuda; Peter De Bisschop; Andreas Erdmann; Giuseppe Citarella; Peter Evanschitzky; Robert Birkner; Rigo Richter; Thomas Scherübl
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The lithographic performance of current state-of-the-art resolution enhancement techniques (RET) will become critical at hyper numerical aperture (NA>1) due to mask 3D effects. We have studied the impact of the mask material on the lithographic performance at NA 1.2 and above. The assessment, both by rigorous simulations and experiments, involves the standard mask stacks, Cr binary mask (BIM) and MoSi 6% attenuated phase shift mask (attPSM), as well as alternatives such as thick Cr BIM, Ta/SiO2 1% and 6% attenuated PSM, and Ta/SiON 1% attenuated PSM. Using the rigorous electro-magnetic field (EMF) and lithographic process simulations (IISB DrLiTHO) the mask structure is optimized taking into account the trade_off with mask error enhancement factor (MEEF). Next, a throughpitch evaluation of the 45nm half-pitch (HP) node at NA1.2-1.35 is carried out examining maximum exposure latitude (EL), depth-of-focus (DOF), best focus shifts, and MEEF behavior for the various mask stacks. For the validation of the simulation methodology a correlation is made between scanner (ASML XT:1700Fi), AIMS (Zeiss AIMSTM45-193i), and simulation results indicating the importance of the mask quality and mask properties. Based on the lithographic performance and the mask manufacturability we put together a ranking of the commercially available mask stacks for the 45nm HP node at NA 1.2 and 1.35.

Paper Details

Date Published: 30 October 2007
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 6730, Photomask Technology 2007, 67301N (30 October 2007); doi: 10.1117/12.746678
Show Author Affiliations
Vicky Philipsen, IMEC (Belgium)
Kei Mesuda, IMEC (Belgium)
Peter De Bisschop, IMEC (Belgium)
Andreas Erdmann, Fraunhofer IISB (Germany)
Giuseppe Citarella, Fraunhofer IISB (Germany)
Peter Evanschitzky, Fraunhofer IISB (Germany)
Robert Birkner, Carl Zeiss SMT (Germany)
Rigo Richter, Carl Zeiss SMT (Germany)
Thomas Scherübl, Carl Zeiss SMT (Germany)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6730:
Photomask Technology 2007
Robert J. Naber; Hiroichi Kawahira, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top