Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Spatial resolution enhancement of EO-1 ALI bands
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

In the mid-1980s, image fusion received significant attention from researchers in remote sensing and image processing, as SPOT 1 (launched in 1986) provided high-resolution (10m) Pan images and low-resolution (20m) MS images. Since that time, much research has been done to develop effective image fusion techniques. Image fusion is a technique used to integrate the geometric detail of a high-resolution panchromatic (Pan) image and the color information of a lowresolution multispectral (MS) image to produce a high-resolution MS image. Many methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Multiplicative Transform, Brovey Transform, and IHS Transform have been developed in the last few years producing good quality fused images. These images are usually characterized by high information content, but with significantly altered spectral information content. There are also some limitations in these fusion techniques. The most significant problem is color distortion. A major reason for the significant color distortion in fusion provoked by many fusion techniques is the wavelength extension of some satellite panchromatic images. Unlike the panchromatic image of the SPOT and IRS sensors, the wavelength range of the new satellites is extended from the visible into the near infrared. This difference significantly changes the gray values of the new panchromatic images. Therefore, traditional image fusion techniques - useful for fusing SPOT Pan with other MS images - cannot achieve quality fusion results for the new satellite images. More recently new techniques have been proposed such as the Wavelet Transform, the Pansharp Transform and the Modified IHS Transform. Those techniques seem to reduce the color distortion problem and to keep the statistical parameters invariable. Ideally, the methods used to fuse image data sets should preserve the spectral characteristics of the original multispectral input image. While many technologies exist and emphasize the preservation of spectral characteristics, they do not take into account the resolution ratio of the input images. Usually the spatial resolution of the panchromatic image is two (Landsat 7, Spot 1-4) or four times (Ikonos, Quickbird) better than the size of the multispectral images. This paper is an attempt to fuse high-resolution panchromatic and low-resolution multispectral bands of the EO-1 ALI sensor. ALI collects nine multispectral bands with 30m resolution and a panchromatic band with 3 times better resolution (10m). ALI has a panchromatic band narrower than the respective band of Landsat7. It has also two narrower bands in the spectral range of Landsat7 band 4. It has also an extra narrower band near the spectral range of Landsat7 band 1. In this study we compare the efficiency of seven fusion techniques and more especially the efficiency of Gram Schmidt, Modified IHS, PCA, Pansharp, Wavelet and LMM (Local Mean Matching) LMVM (Local Mean and Variance Matching) fusion techniques for the fusion of ALI data. Two ALI images collected over the same area have been used. In order to quantitatively measure the quality of the fused images we have made the following controls: Firstly, we have examined the optical qualitative result. Then, we examined the correlation between the original multispectral and the fused images and all the statistical parameters of the histograms of the various frequency bands. All the fusion techniques improve the resolution and the optical result. In contrary to the fusion of other data (ETM, Spot5, Ikonos and Quickbird) all the algorithms provoke small changes to the statistical parameters.

Paper Details

Date Published: 29 September 2006
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 6365, Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XII, 63650A (29 September 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.688990
Show Author Affiliations
Konstantinos G. Nikolakopoulos, Univ. of Athens (Greece)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6365:
Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XII
Lorenzo Bruzzone, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top