Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Experimental verification of finite element model prediction of EUVL mask flatness during electrostatic chucking
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Stringent flatness requirements have been imposed for the front and back surfaces of extreme ultraviolet lithography masks to ensure successful pattern transfer within the image placement error budget. During exposure, an electrostatic chuck will be used to support and flatten the mask. It is therefore critical that the electrostatic chucking process and its effect on mask flatness be well-understood. The current research is focused on the characterization of various aspects of electrostatic chucking through advanced finite element (FE) models and experiments. FE models that use flatness measurements of the mask and the chuck to predict the final flatness of the pattern surface have been developed. Pressure was applied between the reticle and chuck to simulate electrostatic clamping. The modeling results are compared to experimental data obtained using a bipolar Coulombic pin chuck. Electrostatic chucking experiments were performed in a cleanroom, within a vacuum chamber mounted on a vibration isolation cradle, to minimize the effects of particles, humidity, and static charges. During these experiments, the chuck was supported on a 3-point mount; the reticle was placed on the chuck with the backside in contact with the chucking surface and the voltage was applied. A Zygo interferometer was used to measure the flatness of the reticle before and after chucking. The FE models and experiments provide insight into the electrostatic chucking process which will expedite the design of electrostatic chucks and the development of the SEMI standards.

Paper Details

Date Published: 20 October 2006
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 6349, Photomask Technology 2006, 634939 (20 October 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.686153
Show Author Affiliations
Madhura Nataraju, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (United States)
Jaewoong Sohn, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (United States)
Andrew R. Mikkelson, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (United States)
Kevin T. Turner, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (United States)
Roxann L. Engelstad, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison (United States)
Chris K. Van Peski, SEMATECH, Inc. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6349:
Photomask Technology 2006
Patrick M. Martin; Robert J. Naber, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top