Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Photomask etch challenges for future technology nodes
Author(s): Madhavi Chandrachood; Michael Grimbergen; Toi Yue B. Leung; Keven Yu; Renee Koch; Jeff Chen; Ibrahim M. Ibrahim; Sheeba Panayil; Ajay Kumar
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Requirements to meet the 45nm technology node place many challenges on photomask makers. Resolution Enhancement Techniques (RET), employed to extend optical lithography in order to resolve sub-resolution features have burdened mask processes margins. Also, yield compromises rise with every nanometer of error incurred on the photomask (and device) platforms. As photomask costs rise, strict performance control is required for all photomask varieties utilized in the mask shop. Mask etching for future technology nodes, requires a system-level data and diagnostics strategy. This necessity stems from the need to control the performance of the mask etcher at increasingly stringent and diverse requirements of the photomask production environment. From etch applications perspective, alternating phase-shift masks (APSMs) and OPC masks pose key challenges. Specifically, the etcher needs to provide highly uniform CD performance across the entire active area of the photomask - for various feature sizes and load distributions, with no degradation to profiles. It is challenging to strike this balance, yet maintain adequate process window. Future etch systems require sensitive controls and knobs to provide this high precision and repeatable performance. Additionally, incoming variation in plate characteristics and quality necessitate tuning knobs capable of targeting the optimum performance across a diversity of applications.

Paper Details

Date Published: 19 May 2006
PDF: 7 pages
Proc. SPIE 6283, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XIII, 62830C (19 May 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.684417
Show Author Affiliations
Madhavi Chandrachood, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Michael Grimbergen, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Toi Yue B. Leung, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Keven Yu, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Renee Koch, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Jeff Chen, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Ibrahim M. Ibrahim, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Sheeba Panayil, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)
Ajay Kumar, Applied Materials Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6283:
Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XIII
Morihisa Hoga, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top