Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

A comparison of exposure meter systems for three exoplanet-hunting spectrometers: Hamilton, HIRES and APF
Author(s): R. I. Kibrick; D. A. Clarke; W. T. S. Deich; D. Tucker
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The majority of extra-solar planets discovered to date have been found using Doppler-shift measurements obtained with the Hamilton Spectrometer at Lick Observatory and the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (HIRES) at Keck Observatory. Each of these spectrometers employs an integral exposure meter which enables observers to optimize exposure times so as to achieve the required signal-to-noise and to determine the photon-weighted midpoint of each science exposure (which is needed to correct the Doppler shift to the Solar System barycenter). In both of these systems, a propeller mirror located behind the spectrometer slit picks off a few percent of the light and directs it to a photo-multiplier tube (PMT) used to measure the exposure level versus time. In late 2006, the new Automated Planet Finder (APF) Telescope and APF Spectrometer are scheduled to begin operations at Lick Observatory; both will be dedicated exclusively to the search for extra-solar planets. Like the Hamilton and HIRES Spectrometers, the APF Spectrometer will employ an integral exposure meter, but one with a significantly different design. The APF exposure meter will employ a stationary pellicle located ahead of the slit to pick off 4% of the light and direct it to the guide camera. That camera will produce images typically at a 1 Hz rate, and those images will be used both for autoguiding and for computing the exposure level delivered to the spectrometer. In each guide camera image obtained during a science exposure, the time-tagged signal from the pixels that correspond to the spectrometer slit will be integrated in software to determine the current exposure level and the photon-weighted midpoint of that science exposure. We compare these two different design approaches, and describe the significant hardware and software features of each of these systems.

Paper Details

Date Published: 27 June 2006
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 6274, Advanced Software and Control for Astronomy, 62741U (27 June 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.672048
Show Author Affiliations
R. I. Kibrick, UCO/Lick Observatory, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz (United States)
D. A. Clarke, UCO/Lick Observatory, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz (United States)
W. T. S. Deich, UCO/Lick Observatory, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz (United States)
D. Tucker, UCO/Lick Observatory, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6274:
Advanced Software and Control for Astronomy
Hilton Lewis; Alan Bridger, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top