Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Fundamental studies of the properties of photoresists based on resins containing polymer-bound photoacid generators
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Conventional chemically amplified photoresist formulations are complex mixtures that include a protected polymer resin and a small molecule photoacid generator (PAG). The limited compatibility of the PAG with resist resin and the mobility of the small molecule additive can lead to problems including PAG phase separation, non-uniform initial PAG and photoacid distribution, and acid migration during the post-exposure baking (PEB) processes. The incorporation of PAG units into the main chain of the polymer resin is one possible method to alleviate these problems. Recently, we have investigated methacrylate based resists which incorporate novel PAG functional groups into the polymer main chain. These materials have demonstrated good resolution performance for both 193 nm and EUV exposure for sub-100 nm patterning. However, limited information is available on the effect of binding the PAG to the polymer on PAG photoreactivity and photoacid diffusivity. In this work, the photoacid generation rate constant (commonly referred to as the Dill C parameter for the PAG) of both triflate polymer-bound PAG and blended PAG photoresists based on poly(γ-butyrolactone methacrylate -co-2-ethyl-2-adamantyl methacrylate ) resists were determined by a new technique utilizing both quantitative FTIR spectroscopy and kinetic model fitting. The results indicate that the polymer-bound PAG resist has a lower photoacid generation rate constant (C=0.0122) than the blend PAG one (C=0.2647). This large difference in Dill C parameters would indicate that the sensitivity of the polymer-bound PAG resist is substantially lower than that of the analogous blended sample which is consistent with contrast curve data for these two samples.

Paper Details

Date Published: 31 March 2006
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 6153, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXIII, 61532E (31 March 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.663410
Show Author Affiliations
Cheng-Tsung Lee, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States)
Nathan D. Jarnagin, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte (United States)
Mingxing Wang, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte (United States)
Kenneth E. Gonsalves, Univ. of North Carolina, Charlotte (United States)
Jeanette M. Robert, Intel Corp. (United States)
Wang Yueh, Intel Corp. (United States)
Clifford L. Henderson, Georgia Institute of Technology (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6153:
Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XXIII
Qinghuang Lin, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top