Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Alternating PSM balancing characterization: a comparative study using AIMS and wafer print data
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Alternating Phase-Shifting masks (altPSM) are known to provide high contrast imaging combined with a low Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF) at low k1. At feature sizes close to 60nm half-pitch and less the impact of mask topography effects increases. This applies in particular for altPSM. This is due to the quartz etch which is required for every second mask aperture to obtain the 180 degrees phase shift. It enlarges the mask profile height significantly. The influence of the quartz trench profile on the transmission and phase balancing performance has already been studied extensively. Basically it has been shown, that tighter quartz trench profile control, specifically for etch depth and width, is required with decreasing mask feature half pitch. The desired mask pattern geometry optimization is currently based on an evaluation of the printed resist pattern over defocus. However, a mask process engineer can use instead only AIMS measurements of the mask features. Therefore there is a mature interest to check, how good such measurements can replace resist pattern measurements. In the paper therefore it is evaluated how accurate AIMS measurements can describe the real printing performance of an alternating PSM in resist. Impact of differences of the image formation is investigated by use of analytical expressions. Furthermore, the influence of tool imperfections and the presence of resist are discussed. The theoretical results are compared to experimental data taken from AIMS measurements and wafer prints.

Paper Details

Date Published: 21 March 2006
PDF: 15 pages
Proc. SPIE 6154, Optical Microlithography XIX, 615448 (21 March 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.656222
Show Author Affiliations
Martin Sczyrba, Advanced Mask Technology Ctr. GmbH & Co. KG (Germany)
Roderick Köhle, Infineon Technologies AG (Germany)
Karsten Bubke, Advanced Mask Technology Ctr. GmbH & Co. KG (Germany)
Mario Hennig, Infineon Technologies (Germany)
Rainer Pforr, Infineon Technologies (Germany)
Ralf Neubauer, Advanced Mask Technology Ctr. GmbH & Co. KG (Germany)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6154:
Optical Microlithography XIX
Donis G. Flagello, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top