Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Overlay improvement by nonlinear error correction and nonlinear error control by APC
Author(s): Dongsub Choi; Andreas Jahnke; Karl Schumacher; Max Hoepfl
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The continuing downscale of semiconductor fabrication ground rule requires increasingly tighter overlay tolerances, which becomes very challenging at the cutting-edge lithographic node. We need to keep improving overlay performance to admit the requirements of tight overlay budget. The conventional method of overlay control is controlling linear model parameters during alignment and process correction by APC (Advanced Process Control) for linear errors after alignment. Due to this kind of control for linear parameters, this linear error proportion out of total overlay error can be the indicator how well the overlay is being controlled by the conventional overlay control method. After achieving this small proportion of linear error, normally 10 parameters, out of total overlay errors, this conventional method of overlay control face the limitation of improvement and this implies us that it is necessary to work on non-linear overlay error for further improvement. Initial investigation starts from finding out contribution of grid and field for the remained error after 10 parameter linear modeling and the result shows up higher contribution from grid factor. The way to break down grid residual error is by method of control. Nikon provided GCM (Grid Compensation Matching) function which has some options to deal with these non-linear errors, so we tested and simulated a couple of new methods of overlay control to improve the other proportion of total overlay error beside linear overlay error. 1st approach for further improvement was remaining x,y offset feedback through APC for each field after linear modeling and 2nd was non-linear alignment and 3rd is the combination of both methods. This paper will explain which method will improve which part of overlay errors and the test or simulated results of improvement.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 March 2006
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 6152, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XX, 61523W (24 March 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.655157
Show Author Affiliations
Dongsub Choi, Infineon Technology SC300 (Germany)
Andreas Jahnke, Infineon Technology SC300 (Germany)
Karl Schumacher, Infineon Technology SC300 (Germany)
Max Hoepfl, Nikon Precision Europe GmbH (Germany)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6152:
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XX
Chas N. Archie, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top