Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Assessment of the influence of display veiling glare on observer and model performance
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

We evaluated human observer and model (JNDmetrix) performance to assess whether the veiling glare of a digital display influences performance in softcopy interpretation of mammographic images. 160 mammographic images, half with a single mass, were processed to simulate four levels of veiling glare: none, comparable to a typical cathode ray tube (CRT) display, double a CRT and quadruple a CRT. Six radiologist observers were shown the images in a randomized presentation order on a liquid crystal display (LCD) that had relatively no veiling glare. The JNDmetrix human visual system model also analyzed the images. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) techniques showed that performance declined with increasing veiling glare (F = 6.884, p = 0.0035). Quadruple veiling glare yielded significantly lower performance than the lower veiling glare levels. The JNDmetrix model did not predict a reduction in performance with changes in veiling glare, and correlation with the human observer data was modest (0.588). Display veiling glare may influence observer performance, but only at very high levels.

Paper Details

Date Published: 17 March 2006
PDF: 6 pages
Proc. SPIE 6146, Medical Imaging 2006: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 614609 (17 March 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.650677
Show Author Affiliations
Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Jeffrey Lubin, Sarnoff Corp. (United States)
Hans Roehrig, Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Jeffrey Johnson, Siemens Corporate Research (United States)
John Nafziger, Siemens Corporate Research (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6146:
Medical Imaging 2006: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Yulei Jiang; Miguel P. Eckstein, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top