Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Wavefront corrector requirements for compensation of ocular aberrations in two large populations of normal human eyes
Author(s): Nathan Doble; Donald T. Miller; Geunyoung Yoon; Michael A. Helmbrecht; David R. Williams
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Numerous types of wavefront correctors have been employed in adaptive optics (AO) systems for correcting the wave aberrations of the eye. While each has been shown to reduce the degrading impact of the ocular aberrations, none have shown sufficient correction to yield diffraction-limited imaging for large pupils (≥6 mm), where the aberrations are most severe and the benefit of AO is largest. As the wavefront corrector appears to be the limiting AO component, it raises a fundamental concern as to what characteristics of this device, in particular actuator stroke and number, are required to achieve diffraction-limited imaging, and to optimally match corrector performance and cost to that required of a particular imaging task in the eye. In this paper, we model the performance of discrete actuator deformable mirrors, piston-only segmented mirrors, and piston/tip/tilt segmented mirrors in conjunction with wavefront aberrations measured on human eyes in two large population datasets (University of Rochester and Indiana University). The actuator stroke and number required to achieve diffraction-limited imaging for a 7.5 mm pupil were found to be highly dependent on the level of 2nd order aberrations and the population considered. Specifically, the required stroke for encompassing 95% of the population ranged from 12-53 (Rochester) and 7-11 (Indiana) microns. The wide range resulted from whether 2nd order aberrations were corrected or set to zero prior to correction. To achieve a Strehl > 0.8, the actuator number across the pupil diameter ranged from >14 (Rochester) and 11-14 (Indiana) for discrete actuator deformable mirrors, >95 (Rochester) and 50-90 (Indiana) for piston-only segmented mirrors, and finally 12-19 (Rochester) and 9-10 (Indiana) for piston/tip/tilt segmented mirrors.

Paper Details

Date Published: 7 March 2006
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 6138, Ophthalmic Technologies XVI, 61380X (7 March 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.648122
Show Author Affiliations
Nathan Doble, Iris AO, Inc. (United States)
Donald T. Miller, Indiana Univ. (United States)
Geunyoung Yoon, Univ. of Rochester (United States)
Michael A. Helmbrecht, Iris AO, Inc. (United States)
David R. Williams, Univ. of Rochester (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6138:
Ophthalmic Technologies XVI
Fabrice Manns; Per G. Söderberg; Arthur Ho, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top