Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Predicting subjective video quality from separated spatial and temporal assessment
Author(s): Ricardo R. Pastrana-Vidal; Jean C. Gicquel; Jean L. Blin; Hocine Cherifi
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

During real time video communications over packet networks, various degradations can occur on spatial or temporal signal axes. The end-user may perceive loss of image clearness-sharpness and fluidity impairments on visual information. The overall perceived degradation may indeed be seen as a combined contribution of both perceptual axes. A significant perceptual interaction between spatial and temporal quality has been highlighted by a set of subjective quality assessment tests. We show that, at least in our experimental conditions, the overall visual quality can be estimated from independent spatial (clearness-sharpness) and temporal (fluidity) quality assessments. Four visual quality prediction models are presented. The models' predictions show significant correlation with mean opinion scores from a group of observers. The model showing the highest performance takes into account non linear human assessment characteristics. Our results lead to a better understanding of spatiotemporal interactions and they could be useful for the conception of automatic video quality metrics.

Paper Details

Date Published: 9 February 2006
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 6057, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XI, 60570S (9 February 2006); doi: 10.1117/12.642952
Show Author Affiliations
Ricardo R. Pastrana-Vidal, France Telecom (France)
Jean C. Gicquel, France Telecom (France)
Jean L. Blin, France Telecom (France)
Hocine Cherifi, LIRSIA, Univ. de Bourgogne (France)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 6057:
Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XI
Bernice E. Rogowitz; Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas; Scott J. Daly, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top