Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Process window impact of progressive mask defects: its inspection and disposition techniques (go/no-go criteria) via a lithographic detector
Author(s): Jerry Huang; Lan-Hsin Peng; Chih-Wei Chu; Kaustuve Bhattacharyya; Ben Eynon; Farzin Mirzaagha; Tony Dibiase; Kong Son; Jackie Cheng; Ellison Chen; Den Wang
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Progressive mask defect problem is an industry wide mask reliability issue. During the start of this problem when the defects on masks are just forming and are still non-critical, it is possible to continue to run such a problem mask in production with relatively low risk of yield impact. But when the defects approach more critical state, a decision needs to be made whether to pull the mask out of production to send for clean (repair). As this problem increases on the high-end masks running DUV lithography where masks are expensive, it is in the interest of the fab to sustain these problem masks in production as long as possible and take these out of production only when absolutely necessary; i.e., when the defects have reached such a critical condition on these masks that it will impact the process window. During the course of this technical work, investigation has been done towards understanding the impact of such small progressive defects on process window. It was seen that a small growing defect may not print at the best focus exposure condition, but it can still influence the process window and can shrink it significantly. With the help of a high-resolution direct reticle inspection, early detection of these defects is possible, but fabs are still searching for a way to disposition (make a go / no-go decision) on these defective masks. But it is not an easy task as the impact of these defects will depend on not only their size, but also on their transmission and MEEF. A lithographic detector has been evaluated to see if this can predict the criticality of such progressive mask defects.

Paper Details

Date Published: 4 November 2005
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 5992, 25th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, 599206 (4 November 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.632039
Show Author Affiliations
Jerry Huang, ProMOS Technologies Inc. (Taiwan)
Lan-Hsin Peng, ProMOS Technologies Inc. (Taiwan)
Chih-Wei Chu, ProMOS Technologies Inc. (Taiwan)
Kaustuve Bhattacharyya, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Ben Eynon, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Farzin Mirzaagha, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Tony Dibiase, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Kong Son, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Jackie Cheng, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Ellison Chen, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Den Wang, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5992:
25th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology
J. Tracy Weed; Patrick M. Martin, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top