Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Hierarchical roving
Author(s): Gregory Konesky
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

The selection of rover size, whether the environment be on land, in the sea or air, or on the surface of another world, necessarily entails certain tradeoffs. These tradeoffs include vehicle mass, power source, speed, range, size of obstacles that can be dealt with, sensor compliment, and ultimately, mission objectives. Smaller sized vehicles have advantages in that they tend to be more nimble and can more closely explore a complex environment, but, in general, at a cost of reduced capability in all other areas. Larger vehicles enhance these capabilities, but at a cost of being somewhat ponderous, especially in complex environments. Hierarchical roving seeks to maximize the best of these extremes by carrying a hierarchy of smaller specialized rovers within a larger one. The larger rover acts as a carrier vehicle, communications relay, and power recharge source. The smaller specialized vehicles are deployed at a given site, execute their mission, are then recovered by the carrier vehicle, and finally transported to the next site. Greater situational awareness and the opportunity for self-rescue are additional benefits of hierarchical roving. Experience with a carrier vehicle containing three smaller vehicles is discussed, as are the design tradeoffs.

Paper Details

Date Published: 17 November 2005
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 5999, Intelligent Systems in Design and Manufacturing VI, 59990M (17 November 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.624637
Show Author Affiliations
Gregory Konesky, SGK Nanostructures, Inc. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5999:
Intelligent Systems in Design and Manufacturing VI
Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top