Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Thirty different views of a lens design solution space: a good example for teaching students how to design and not to design a lens
Author(s): Julie L. Bentley
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

The design of high numerical aperture objective to be used as an optical data storage device was given out as a midterm exam in a lens design class consisting of twenty-nine students. The design space was restricted by the following constraints: the number of elements could not exceed three, only three material types were available, and the maximum overall length and the minimum working distance requirements were given. The students were allowed to pick their own starting point and were graded on both the maximum resolution they could achieve and the manufacturability of the design. The results were compiled into a design study. Although a few of the designs violated the specifications, the remainder could be grouped into three distinct design forms. The three different design forms were then analyzed for their ability to "stretch" the specifications (ex. working distance or resolution) while discussing the difference in tolerances between the design forms. The designs were also used to highlight the importance of controlling edge thicknesses and center thicknesses during the design process.

Paper Details

Date Published: 24 August 2005
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 5875, Novel Optical Systems Design and Optimization VIII, 58750C (24 August 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.623157
Show Author Affiliations
Julie L. Bentley, Corning Tropel (United States)
Univ. of Rochester (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5875:
Novel Optical Systems Design and Optimization VIII
Jose M. Sasian; R. John Koshel; Richard C. Juergens, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top