Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Comparisons of overlay measurement using conventional bright-field microscope and angular scatterometer
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

As overlay tolerances of microlithographic technology become increasingly severe, conventional bright-field metrology systems are limited by image resolution and precision. Scatterometer (angular scatterometer or spectroscopic reflectometer, for example) has the advantages of good repeatability and reproducibility, and is proposed as an alternative solution for overlay metrology. Previous studies have applied a spectroscopic reflectometer, which is as function of incident wavelength, to overlay measurement. This work investigated overlay measurement by using an angular scatterometer, which is as function of incident angle. A focused laser spot was incident on linear grating, an overlay target. An angular signature, a 0th-order reflective light beam, scattered from linear grating was measured when the incident and reflective angles were changed simultaneously. The overlay target consists of two linear gratings located on two different layers of a stacked structure, and the overlay error is the misalignment between these two different layers. The measured results using angular scatterometer (also known as the diffraction-based method) are compared with using the bright-field microscope (also known as the image-based method), which use a bar-in-bar target as an overlay target. Statistical data sets demonstrate that angular sctterometer has nearly one order better of repeatability and tool induced shift than conventional bright-field microscope. Additionally, a series of different parameters of overlay targets, such as different pitches, line-to-space ratios, and stacked structures is designed and manufactured. The sensitivity of overlay measurement of various linear grating targets is also measured and discussed.

Paper Details

Date Published: 10 May 2005
PDF: 10 pages
Proc. SPIE 5752, Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX, (10 May 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.599306
Show Author Affiliations
Chun-Hung Ko, Industrial Technology Research Institute (Taiwan)
Yi-sha Ku, Industrial Technology Research Institute (Taiwan)
Nigel Smith, Accent Optical Technologies (Taiwan)
Deh-Ming Shyu, National Chiao Tung Univ. (Taiwan)
Institute of Electro-Optical Engineering (Taiwan)
Shih-Chun Wang, Industrial Technology Research Institute (Taiwan)
Sheng-Hua Lu, Industrial Technology Research Institute (Taiwan)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5752:
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX
Richard M. Silver, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top