Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Estimating surface radiation dose from multidetector CT: cylindrical phantoms, anthropomorphic phantoms, and Monte Carlo simulations
Author(s): J. J. DeMarco; C. H. Cagnon; D. D. Cody; D. M. Stevens; C. H. McCollough; J. O'Daniel; M. F. McNitt-Gray
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $17.00 $21.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Multidetector CT (MDCT) systems offer larger coverage and wider z-axis beams, resulting in larger cone angles. One impact on radiation dose is that while radiation profiles at isocenter are constant when contiguous axial scans are performed, the increased beam divergence from the larger cone angle results in significant surface dose variation. The purpose of this work was to measure the magnitude of this effect. Contiguous axial scans were acquired using an MDCT for two sizes of cylindrical phantoms and an anthropomorphic phantom. Film dosimetry and/or radiation detector measurements were performed on the surface of each phantom. Detailed mathematical models were developed for the MDCT scanner and all phantoms. Monte Carlo simulations of contiguous axial scans were performed for each phantom model. From cylindrical phantoms, film dosimetry at the surface showed differences between peak and valley that reached 50%. From the anthropomorphic phantom, measured values ranged from 7.9 to 16.2 mGy at the phantom surface. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated these variations in both cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. The magnitude of variation was also related to object size. Even when contiguous axial scans are performed on MDCT, surface radiation profiles show considerable variation. This variation will increase as MDCT cone angles increase and when non-contiguous scans (e.g. pitch > 1) are acquired. The variation is also a function of object size. While average surface doses may remain constant, peak doses may increase, which may be significant for radiation sensitive organs at or near the surface (e.g. breast, thyroid).

Paper Details

Date Published: 20 April 2005
PDF: 11 pages
Proc. SPIE 5745, Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, (20 April 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.595933
Show Author Affiliations
J. J. DeMarco, David Geffen School of Medicine at Univ. of California/Los Angeles (United States)
C. H. Cagnon, David Geffen School of Medicine at Univ. of California/Los Angeles (United States)
D. D. Cody, The Univ. of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. (United States)
D. M. Stevens, The Univ. of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. (United States)
C. H. McCollough, Mayo Clinic (United States)
J. O'Daniel, The Univ. of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr. (United States)
M. F. McNitt-Gray, David Geffen School of Medicine at Univ. of California/Los Angeles (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5745:
Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging
Michael J. Flynn, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top