Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Impulse response analysis for several digital tomosynthesis mammography reconstruction algorithms
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Digital tomosynthesis mammography algorithms allow reconstructions of arbitrary planes in the breast from limited-angle series of projection images as the x-ray source moves along an arc above the breast. Though several tomosynthesis algorithms have been proposed, no complete comparison of the methods has previously been conducted. This paper presents an analysis of impulse response for four different tomosynthesis mammography reconstruction algorithms. Simulated impulses at different 3-D locations were simulated to investigate the sharpness of reconstructed in-plane structures and to see how effective each algorithm is at removing out-of-plane blur. Datasets with 41, 21 and 11 projection images of the impulse were generated with a total angular movement of +/- 10 degrees of the simulated x-ray point source. Four algorithms, including shift-and-add method, Niklason algorithm, filtered back projection (FBP), and matrix inversion tomosynthesis (MITS) are investigated. Compared with shift-and-add algorithm and Niklason method, MITS and FBP performed better for in-plane response and out-of-plane blur removal. MITS showed better out-of-plane blur removal in general. MITS and FBP performed better when projection numbers increase.

Paper Details

Date Published: 20 April 2005
PDF: 9 pages
Proc. SPIE 5745, Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging, (20 April 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.595684
Show Author Affiliations
Ying Chen, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
Joseph Y. Lo, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)
James T. Dobbins, Duke Univ. (United States)
Duke Univ. Medical Ctr. (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5745:
Medical Imaging 2005: Physics of Medical Imaging
Michael J. Flynn, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top