Share Email Print
cover

Proceedings Paper

Efficiency of human and model observers for signal-detection tasks in non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00

Paper Abstract

Efficiencies of the human observer and channelized-Hotelling observers (CHOs) relative to the ideal observer for signal-detection tasks are discussed. A CHO using Laguerre-Gauss channels, which we call an efficient CHO (eCHO), and a CHO adding a scanning scheme to the eCHO to include signal-location uncertainty, which we call a scanning eCHO (seCHO), are considered. Both signal-known-exactly (SKE) tasks and signal-known-statistically (SKS) tasks are considered. Signal location is uncertain for the SKS tasks, and lumpy backgrounds are used for background uncertainty in both the tasks. Markov-chain Monte Carlo methods are employed to determine ideal-observer performance on the detection tasks. Psychophysical studies are conducted to compute human-observer performance on the same tasks. A maximum-likelihood estimation method is employed to fit smooth psychometric curves with observer performance measurements. Efficiency is computed as the squared ratio of the detectabilities of the observer of interest to a standard observer. Depending on image statistics, the ideal observer or the Hotelling observer is used as the standard observer. The results show that the eCHO performs poorly in detecting signals with location uncertainty and the seCHO performs only slightly better while the ideal observer outperforms the human observer and CHOs for both the tasks. Human efficiencies are approximately less than 2.5% and 41%, respectively, for the SKE and SKS tasks, where the gray levels of the lumpy background are non-Gaussian distributed. These results also imply that human observers are not affected by signal-location uncertainty as much as the ideal observer. However, for the SKE tasks using Gaussian-distributed lumpy backgrounds, the human efficiency ranges between 28% and 42%. Three different simplified pinhole imaging systems are simulated and the humans and the model observers rank the systems in the same order for both the tasks.

Paper Details

Date Published: 6 April 2005
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 5749, Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (6 April 2005); doi: 10.1117/12.592238
Show Author Affiliations
Subok Park, NIBIB/CDRH Lab. for the Assessment of Medical Imaging Systems, US FDA (United States)
Eric Clarkson, The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Optical Sciences Ctr./The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Matthew A. Kupinski, The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Optical Sciences Ctr./The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Harrison H. Barrett, The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
Optical Sciences Ctr./The Univ. of Arizona (United States)


Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5749:
Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Miguel P. Eckstein; Yulei Jiang, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top