Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Double dipole lithography for 65-nm node and beyond: defect sensitivity characterization and reticle inspection
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Double Dipole Lithography (DDLä) has been demonstrated to be capable of patterning complex 2D devices patterns. [1,2,3] Due to inherently high aerial image contrast from dipole illumination, we have found that it can meet lithography manufacturing requirements, such as line edge roughness (LER), and critical dimension uniformity (CDU), for the upcoming 65nm node using ArF binary chrome masks. For patterning at k1 below 0.35, DDL is one of the promising resolution enhancement techniques (RET), which can offer process latitudes that are comparable to more costly alternatives such as two-exposure alternating PSM. To use DDL for printing actual IC devices, the original design data must be converted into a "vertical (V)" mask and a "horizontal (H)" mask for the respective X-dipole and Y-dipole exposures. We demonstrated that our model-based DDL mask data processing methodology is capable of converting complex 2D logic and memory designs into dipole-compatible mask layouts. [2,3] Due to the double exposure, stray light must be well controlled to ensure uniform printing across the entire chip. One intuitive solution to minimize stray light is to apply large patches of chrome in the open field areas in order to reduce the background (non-pattern area) exposure level. Unfortunately, this is not viable for a clear-field poly gate mask as it incorporates a positive photoresist process. We developed an innovative and practical background-shielding scheme called sub-resolution grating block (SGB), which is part of the DDL layout conversion method for full-chip application. This technique can effectively minimize the impact of long-range stray light on critical features during the two exposures. Reticles inspection is another important issue for the implementation of DDL technology. In this work, we reported a methodology on how to characterize defects and optimize inspection sensitivity for DDL RET reticles.

Paper Details

Date Published: 6 December 2004
PDF: 12 pages
Proc. SPIE 5567, 24th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology, (6 December 2004); doi: 10.1117/12.569367
Show Author Affiliations
Stephen Hsu, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Tsann-bin Chu, ASML TDC Asia (Taiwan)
Douglas Van Den Broeke, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
J. Fung Chen, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Michael Hsu, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
Noel P. Corcoran, ASML MaskTools, Inc. (United States)
William Volk, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Wayne E. Ruch, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Jean-Paul E. Sier, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Carl E. Hess, KLA-Tencor Corp. (United States)
Benjamin Szu-Min Lin, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
Chun-Chi Yu, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)
George Huang, United Microelectronics Corp. (Taiwan)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5567:
24th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology
Wolfgang Staud; J. Tracy Weed, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top