Share Email Print

Proceedings Paper

Optimization of detector pixel size for stent visualization in x-ray fluoroscopy
Format Member Price Non-Member Price
PDF $14.40 $18.00
cover GOOD NEWS! Your organization subscribes to the SPIE Digital Library. You may be able to download this paper for free. Check Access

Paper Abstract

Pixel size is of great interest in flat-panel detector design. To visualize small interventional devices such as a stent in angiographic x-ray fluoroscopy, pixels should be small to limit contrast dilution from partial-area and large to collect sufficient x-rays for an adequate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Using quantitative experimental and modeling techniques, we investigated the optimal pixel sizes for visualization of a stent created from 50 μm diameter wires. Image quality was evaluated by the ability of subjects to perform two tasks: detect the presence of a stent and discriminate a partially deployed stent from a fully deployed one. With regard to detection, for the idealized direct detector, the 100 μm pixel size resulted in maximum measured contrast sensitivity. For an idealized indirect detector, with a scintillating layer, the maximal measured contrast sensitivity was obtained at 200 μm pixel size. The channelized human observer model predicted a peak at 150 and 170 μm, for idealized direct and indirect detectors, respectively. Stent deployment is more sensitive to pixel size than stent detection, resulting in a steeper drop in performance with large pixels. With regard to stent deployment detection, smaller even pixel sizes are favored for both detector types. With increasing exposures, the model predicts a smaller optimal pixel size because the noise penalty is reduced.

Paper Details

Date Published: 4 May 2004
PDF: 8 pages
Proc. SPIE 5372, Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, (4 May 2004); doi: 10.1117/12.535934
Show Author Affiliations
Yuhao Jiang, Case Western Reserve Univ. (United States)
David L. Wilson, Case Western Reserve Univ. (United States)

Published in SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5372:
Medical Imaging 2004: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Dev P. Chakraborty; Miguel P. Eckstein, Editor(s)

© SPIE. Terms of Use
Back to Top